Lower socioeconomic status predicts higher mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure
Open accessAbstract
Objective: It is not fully understood whether and how socioeconomic status (SES) has a prognostic impact in patients with heart failure (HF). We assessed SES and its association with patient characteristics and outcomes in a contemporary and well-characterised HF cohort. Methods: Socioeconomic risk factors (SERF) were defined in the Swedish HF Registry based on income (low vs high according to the annual median value), education level (no degree/compulsory school vs university/secondary school) and living arrangement (living alone vs cohabitating). Results: Of 44 631 patients, 21% had no, 33% one, 30% two and 16% three SERF. Patient characteristics strongly and independently associated with lower SES were female sex and no specialist referral. Additional independent associations were older age, more severe HF, heavier comorbidity burden, use of diuretics and less use of HF devices. Lower SES was associated with higher risk of HF hospitalisation/mortality, and overall cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular events. These associations persisted after extensive adjustment for patient characteristics, treatments and care. The magnitude of the association increased linearly with the increasing number of coexistent SERF: HR (95% CI) 1.09 (1.05 to 1.13) for one, 1.16 (1.12 to 1.20) for two and 1.22 (1.18 to 1.28) for three SERF (p<0.01). Conclusions: In a contemporary and well-characterised HF cohort and after comprehensive adjustment for confounders, lower SES was linked with multiple factors such as less use of HF devices and age, but most strongly with female sex and lack of specialist referral; and associated with greater risk of morbidity/mortality.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individuals of lower socioeconomic status experience worse cardiovascular outcomes and have higher rates of cardiovascular risk factors.
“Studies have shown that individuals of lower SES experience worse cardiovascular outcomes and have higher rates of cardiovascular risk factors [5,[21], [22], [23]].”
From Income disparity and utilization of cardiovascular preventive care services among U.S. adults (2021) · cites this paper as [5]
The Introduction states that lower SES is associated with poorer outcomes in the general population and in patients with cardiovascular disease. The Morbidity/mortality section reports more cardiovascular events at lower SES, and the Prevalence of socioeconomic risk factors section links lower SES with smoking, obesity and diabetes. Those risk-factor findings come from patients with heart failure, so they do not establish higher rates among individuals generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- Savarese G, Lund LH. Global Public Health Burden of Heart Failure. Cardiac failure review: Radcliffe Cardiology 2017:7-11.
- Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J 2016;37:2129-200.
- Magnussen C, Niiranen TJ, Ojeda FM, et al. Sex-Specific Epidemiology of Heart Failure Risk and Mortality in Europe: Results From the BiomarCaRE Consortium. JACC Heart Fail 2019;7:204-13.
- Mackenbach JP, Stirbu I, Roskam AJ, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in health in 22 European countries. N Engl J Med 2008;358:2468-81.
- Lindenauer PK, Lagu T, Rothberg MB, et al. Income inequality and 30 day outcomes after acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 2013;346:f521.
- Schjodt I, Johnsen SP, Stromberg A, et al. Socioeconomic Factors and Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Heart Failure in a Universal Health Care System. JACC Heart Fail 2019;7:746-55.
- Lawson CA, Zaccardi F, Squire I, et al. 20-year trends in cause-specific heart failure outcomes by sex, socioeconomic status, and place of diagnosis: a population- based study. The Lancet Public Health 2019;4:e406-e20.
- Savarese G, Carrero JJ, Pitt B, et al. Factors associated with underuse of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: an analysis of 11 215 patients from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry. Eur J Heart Fail 2018;20:1326-34.
- Lund LH, Mancini D. Heart failure in women. Med Clin North Am 2004;88:1321-45, xii.
- Lund LH, Braunschweig F, Benson L, et al. Association between demographic, organizational, clinical, and socio-economic characteristics and underutilization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry. Eur J Heart Fail 2017;19:1270-9.
- Lund LH, Trochu JN, Meyns B, et al. Screening for heart transplantation and left ventricular assist system: results from the ScrEEning for advanced Heart Failure treatment (SEE-HF) study. Eur J Heart Fail 2018;20:152-60.
- Lainscak M, Milinkovic I, Polovina M, et al. Sex-and age-related differences in the management and outcomes of chronic heart failure: an analysis of patients from the ESC HFA EORP Heart Failure Long-Term Registry. Eur J Heart Fail 2020;22:92- 102.
- Thorvaldsen T, Benson L, Stahlberg M, et al. Triage of patients with moderate to severe heart failure: who should be referred to a heart failure center? J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:661-71.
- Crespo-Leiro MG, Metra M, Lund LH, et al. Advanced heart failure: a position statement of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Heart Fail 2018;20:1505-35.
- Potter EL, Hopper I, Sen J, et al. Impact of socioeconomic status on incident heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes 2019;5:169-79.
- Hawkins NM, Jhund PS, McMurray JJ, et al. Heart failure and socioeconomic status: accumulating evidence of inequality. Eur J Heart Fail 2012;14:138-46.
- Jousilahti P, Salomaa V, Rasi V, et al. Association of markers of systemic inflammation, C reactive protein, serum amyloid A, and fibrinogen, with socioeconomic status. J Epidemiol Community Health 2003;57:730-3.
- Schaufelberger M, Rosengren A. Heart failure in different occupational classes in Sweden. Eur Heart J 2007;28:212-8.
- Aggarwal M, Bozkurt B, Panjrath G, et al. Lifestyle Modifications for Preventing and Treating Heart Failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;72:2391-405.
- Munoz D, Uzoije P, Reynolds C, et al. Polypill for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in an Underserved Population. N Engl J Med 2019;381:1114-23.
- Udell JA, Desai NR, Li S, et al. Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Care After Myocardial Infarction in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2018;11:e004054.
- Magnani JW, Mujahid MS, Aronow HD, et al. Health Literacy and Cardiovascular Disease: Fundamental Relevance to Primary and Secondary Prevention: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2018;138:e48-e74.
- Stafford M, von Wagner C, Perman S, et al. Social connectedness and engagement in preventive health services: an analysis of data from a prospective cohort study. The Lancet Public Health 2018;3:e438-e46.
- Wang Y, Sloan FA. Present bias and health. J Risk Uncertain 2018;57:177-98.
- Witte KK, Patel PA, Walker AMN, et al. Socioeconomic deprivation and mode- specific outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure. Heart 2018;104:993-8.
- Mellis AM, Athamneh LN, Stein JS, et al. Less is more: Negative income shock increases immediate preference in cross commodity discounting and food demand. Appetite 2018;129:155-61.
- Stringhini S, Carmeli C, Jokela M, et al. Socioeconomic status and the 25 x 25 risk factors as determinants of premature mortality: a multicohort study and meta- analysis of 1.7 million men and women. Lancet 2017;389:1229-37.
- Beard E, Brown J, West R, et al. Associations between socio-economic factors and alcohol consumption: A population survey of adults in England. PLoS One 2019;14:e0209442.
- Casetta B, Videla AJ, Bardach A, et al. Association Between Cigarette Smoking Prevalence and Income Level: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nicotine Tob Res 2017;19:1401-7.
- Santema BT, Ouwerkerk W, Tromp J, et al. Identifying optimal doses of heart failure medications in men compared with women: a prospective, observational, cohort study. Lancet 2019;394:1254-63. Summary statistics shown in Table 1 are based on unimputed data. Continuous variables are presented as mean (±standard 525 deviation) and compared by one-way analysis of variance if normally distributed, and as median (25 th , 75 th percentile) and 526
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Income disparity and utilization of cardiovascular preventive care services among U.S. adults
Shahu, A., Okunrintemi, V., Tibuakuu, M., Khan, S. U., Gulati, M., Marvel, F., Blumenthal, R. S., & Michos, E. D. (2021) · American Journal of Preventive Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.ajpc.2021.100286 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
“[5] Schrage B , Lund LH , Benson L , et al.”
Background
- Authors
- Schrage, B., Lund, L. H., Benson, L., Stolfo, D., Ohlsson, A., Westerling, R., Westermann, D., Strömberg, A., Dahlström, U., Braunschweig, F., Ferreira, J. P., & Savarese, G.
- Affiliations
- Universität Hamburg (DE)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- University of Trieste (IT)
- Uppsala University (SE)
- Linköping University (SE)
- Inserm (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Savarese, Gianluigi
- ORCID
- Venue
- Heart
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2020-08-07
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 229-236
- ISSN
- 1355-6037 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-201X
- OpenAlex
- W3047674262
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7
- FWCI
- 4.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hal.univ-lorraine.fr
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Heart (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Uppsala University Publications (Uppsala University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (116074)
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
- Keywords
- heart failure, socioeconomic status, socioeconomic risk factors, mortality, hospitalization, prognosis, income, educational attainment, living arrangements, specialist referral, sex differences, comorbidities, heart failure devices, cardiovascular events
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Morbidity, Risk Factors, Social Class
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review