The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Getting the most out of cardiac rehabilitation: a review of referral and adherence predictors
Open accessAbstract
Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation reduces mortality and morbidity but is utilised by only a fraction of eligible cardiac patients, with the participation rate of women being only about half that of men. This quantitative review assesses 32 studies meeting inclusion criteria, describing 16 804 patients, 5882 of whom were female. It was found that the main predictor of referral to a cardiac rehabilitation programme was the physician’s endorsement of the effectiveness of such a programme. Patients were more likely to participate in rehabilitation programmes when they were actively referred, educated, married, possessed high self efficacy, and when the programmes were easily accessible. Patients were less likely to participate when they had to travel long distances to participate in a cardiac rehabilitation programme, or experienced guilt over family obligations. Women were less often referred and participated less often even after referral. In conclusion, many of the observed predictors, including those particular to women, are potentially modifiable with the help of health professionals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Trials for Myocardial Infarction
Lau, J., Antman, E. M., Jimenez-Silva, J., Kupelnick, B., Mosteller, F., & Chalmers, T. C. (1992) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199207233270406 · Cited by 1,140
Ades, P. A., Waldmann, M. L., Polk, D. M., & Coflesky, J. T. (1992) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/0002-9149(92)90894-5 · Cited by 364
Women's views of cardiac rehabilitation programs
Moore, S. M. (1996) · Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/00008483-199603000-00007 · Cited by 113
Cited by
Baddour, L. M., Wilson, W. R., Bayer, A. S., Fowler, V. G., Bolger, A. F., Levison, M. E., Ferrieri, P., Gerber, M. A., Tani, L. Y., Gewitz, M. H., et al. (2005) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.105.165564 · Cited by 1,707
Socioeconomic status and cardiovascular disease: risks and implications for care
Clark, A. M., DesMeules, M., Luo, W., Duncan, A. S., & Wielgosz, A. (2009) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2009.163 · Cited by 533
Rutledge, T., Redwine, L. S., Linke, S. E., & Mills, P. J. (2013) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/psy.0b013e318291d798 · Cited by 277
French, D. P., Cooper, A., & Weinman, J. (2006) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.07.029 · Cited by 270
Huang, K., Liu, W., He, D., Huang, B., Xiao, D., Peng, Y., He, Y., Hu, H., Chen, M., & Huang, D. (2015) · European Journal of Preventive Cardiology · doi:10.1177/2047487314561168 · Cited by 234
Metadata
- Authors
- Jackson, L., Leclerc, J., Erskine, Y., & Linden, W.
- Venue
- Heart
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2004-12-16
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 10-14
- ISSN
- 1355-6037 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-201X
- OpenAlex
- W2107494131
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Getting the most out of cardiac rehabilitation: a review of referral and adherence predictors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/hrt.2004.045559
- The paper
- Jackson, L., Leclerc, J., Erskine, Y., & Linden, W. (2005). Getting the most out of cardiac rehabilitation: a review of referral and adherence predictors. Heart. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2004.045559
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.