Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 247

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

THE NATURAL HISTORY OF 271 PATIENTS WITH MITRAL STENOSIS UNDER MEDICAL TREATMENT

Open access
Olesen, K. H.·1962·Heart

Abstract

This report is a follow-up of 271 patients with isolated mitral stenosis under medical treatment.The material comprises patients who came under medical care for cardiac symptoms during the years 1933-49.A first report of this series has already been published (Olesen, 1955).By 1959, 83 per cent of the patients had died, and the majority of survivors showed symptoms and signs of progression of the disease.On this background an analysis of the last follow-up data is presented as a contribution to the description of the natural history of mitral stenosis. MATERIAL AND METHODSThe material comprises 271 patients with isolated mitral stenosis derived from the following sources: (1) 213 patients who were admitted to the Medical Department B, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Denmark, under the care of Professor Erik Warburg during the years 1933-49, and (2) 58 who saw Professor Warburg in private consultation during the same period.The clinical diagnosis of mitral stenosis was based upon the presence of a rough, rolling, or rasping diastolic or presystolic apical murmur.Patients with definite auscultatory signs of aortic valvular lesions were excluded.The material includes 261 patients with a sure clinical diagnosis and 10 patients with autopsy diagnosis.The validity of the clinical diagnosis of mitral stenosis was checked in several ways: (1) 91 patients eventually came to autopsy, and mitral stenosis was verified in all instances, (2) at the clinical follow-up 78 patients were examined by the author in 1951-53, and 31 were re-examined in 1959, and the characteristic diastolic or presystolic murmurs were heard in all cases (in one patient an additional atrial septal defect was diagnosed), (3) 12 patients were subjected to mitral valvotomy during the period of observation and mitral stenosis was corroborated in all cases.Complicating aortic valvular disease which had not been previously diagnosed was found at autopsy in 4 out of 91 cases and at clinical follow-up in 12 out of 78 patients.Tricuspid valvular stenosis occurred at autopsy in 5 out of 91 patients.Apparently the frequency of complicating aortic and tricuspid valvular lesions was low.At the selection of the series all patients with a characteristic diastolic or presystolic apical murmur were grouped as mitral stenosis whether an apical systolic murmur had been present or not, since mitral regurgitation in the presence of signs of mitral stenosis traditionally had not been evalu- ated at the time of first observation.A total of 43 per cent of the series had an apical systolic murmur recorded, and this group may be assumed to comprise many patients with some degree of 349 on July 11,

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/hrt.24.3.349

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 247

Metadata

Authors
Olesen, K. H.
Venue
Heart
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1962-05-01
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
349-357
ISSN
1355-6037 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092153594
Cited by
247
References
0
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE NATURAL HISTORY OF 271 PATIENTS WITH MITRAL STENOSIS UNDER MEDICAL TREATMENT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/hrt.24.3.349
The paper
Olesen, K. H. (1962). THE NATURAL HISTORY OF 271 PATIENTS WITH MITRAL STENOSIS UNDER MEDICAL TREATMENT. Heart. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.24.3.349

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.