The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prognostic value of ECG findings for total, cardiovascular disease, and coronary heart disease death in men and women
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To study abnormalities in the resting ECG as independent predictors for all cause, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality in a population based random sample of men and women, and to explore whether their prognostic value is different between sexes. Design and subjects: An age and sex stratified random sample was selected from the total Belgian population aged 25 to 74 years. Baseline data were gathered and resting ECGs were classified according to Minnesota code criteria. The sample was then followed for at least 10 years with respect to cause specific death. Results are based on observations from 5208 men and 4746 women free from prevalent CHD at the start of the follow up period. Results: Although the prevalence of major abnormalities in general was comparable between sexes, women had more ischaemic findings, ST segment changes, and abnormal T waves on their baseline ECG, while men showed more arrhythmias, bundle branch blocks, and left ventricular hypertrophy. Fitting the multiplicative effect on subsequent mortality between all ECG classifications under study and sex indicated that the prognostic value of ECG changes was equal in women and men. Independently of other risk factors and other major ECG changes, almost all ECG classifications were significantly related to all cause, CVD, and CHD mortality. The most predictive ECG findings for CVD death were ST segment depression (risk ratio (RR) 4.71), major ECG findings (RR 3.26), left ventricular hypertrophy (RR 2.79), bundle branch blocks (RR 2.58), T wave flattening (RR 2.47), ischaemic ECG findings (RR 2.35), and arrhythmias (RR 2.15). The prognostic value of major ECG findings for CVD and CHD death was more powerful than well established cardiovascular risk factors. Conclusions: Abnormalities in the baseline ECG are strongly associated with subsequent all cause, CVD, and CHD mortality. Their predictive value was similar for men and women.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Newly acquired left bundle-branch block: the framingham study
SCHNEIDER, J. F., THOMAS, H. E., KREGER, B. E., McNAMARA, P. M., & KANNEL, W. B. (1979) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-90-3-303 · Cited by 370
Cited by
Greenland (2000) · doi:10.1161/01.cir.101.1.e16 · Cited by 924
Kumar, A., Prineas, R. J., Arnold, A. M., Psaty, B. M., Furberg, C. D., Robbins, J., & Lloyd-Jones, D. M. (2008) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.108.772541 · Cited by 69
Mieszczanska, H., Pietrasik, G., Piotrowicz, K., McNitt, S., Moss, A. J., & Zareba, W. (2008) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.07.077 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- De Bacquer, D., De Backer, G., Kornitzer, M., & Blackburn, H.
- Venue
- Heart
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1998-12-01
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 570-577
- ISSN
- 1355-6037 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-201X
- OpenAlex
- W2015195838
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic value of ECG findings for total, cardiovascular disease, and coronary heart disease death in men and women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/hrt.80.6.570
- The paper
- De Bacquer, D., De Backer, G., Kornitzer, M., & Blackburn, H. (1998). Prognostic value of ECG findings for total, cardiovascular disease, and coronary heart disease death in men and women. Heart. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.80.6.570
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.