The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Aortic root dilatation in young men with normally functioning bicuspid aortic valves
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the dimensions of the aortic root in a selected population of young males with isolated normally functioning bicuspid aortic valve. DESIGN AND SETTING: Echocardiographic and Doppler evaluation of conscripts with bicuspid aortic valve at the time of military pre-enrolment screening in two military hospitals. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: 66 consecutive young men with a normally functioning bicuspid aortic valve were studied to assess aortic size at four aortic levels: annulus, sinuses of Valsalva, supra-aortic ridge, and proximal ascending aorta; 70 consecutive normal young subjects, matched for age and body surface area, were used as controls. RESULTS: In men with a bicuspid aortic valve, the diameter of the aortic root was significantly larger than in controls at the sinuses (3.16 (0.37)v 2.87 (0.31) cm, p < 0.001), at the supra-aortic ridge (2.64 (0.46) v 2.47 (0.28) cm, p = 0.01), and at the level of the proximal ascending aorta (3.12 (0.48) v 2.69 (0.28) cm, p < 0.001). The prevalence of aortic root dilatation was 7.5% at the annulus (5/66), 19.6% at the sinuses (13/66), 15% at the supra-aortic ridge (10/66), and 43.9% at the ascending aorta (29/66); 32 subjects (48%) had aortic root dimensions comparable with controls, while 34 (52%) had definitely abnormal aortic root dimensions. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic root enlargement in people with a bicuspid aortic valve occurs independently of haemodynamic abnormalities, age, and body size. However, there appear to be different subgroups of young adults with bicuspid aortic valves, one of which is characterised by aortic dilatation, possibly caused by a congenital abnormality of the aortic wall.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Erbel (2014) · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu281 · Cited by 4,451
Otto, C. M., Nishimura, R. A., Bonow, R. O., Carabello, B. A., Erwin, J. P., Gentile, F., Jneid, H., Krieger, E. V., Mack, M., McLeod, C., et al. (2021) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000923 · Cited by 3,686
2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
Nishimura, R. A., Otto, C. M., Bonow, R. O., Carabello, B. A., Erwin, J. P., Guyton, R. A., O’Gara, P. T., Ruiz, C. E., Skubas, N. J., Sorajja, P., et al. (2014) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.536 · Cited by 3,523
Nishimura, R. A., Otto, C. M., Bonow, R. O., Carabello, B. A., Erwin, J. P., Guyton, R. A., O’Gara, P. T., Ruiz, C. E., Skubas, N. J., Sorajja, P., et al. (2014) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000029 · Cited by 2,566
2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary
Nishimura, R. A., Otto, C. M., Bonow, R. O., Carabello, B. A., Erwin, J. P., Guyton, R. A., O'Gara, P. T., Ruiz, C. E., Skubas, N. J., Sorajja, P., et al. (2014) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.537 · Cited by 1,642
Metadata
- Authors
- Nistri, S., Sorbo, M. D., Marin, M., Palisi, M., Scognamiglio, R., & Thiene, G.
- Venue
- Heart
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1999-07-01
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-22
- ISSN
- 1355-6037 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-201X
- OpenAlex
- W2141399302
- Cited by
- 465
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aortic root dilatation in young men with normally functioning bicuspid aortic valves. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/hrt.82.1.19
- The paper
- Nistri, S., Sorbo, M. D., Marin, M., Palisi, M., Scognamiglio, R., & Thiene, G. (1999). Aortic root dilatation in young men with normally functioning bicuspid aortic valves. Heart. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.82.1.19
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.