Cited by 19Traffic and Road SafetyInjury Epidemiology and PreventionRoad Transport and Highway Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cost benefit analysis of 20 mph zones in London

Abstract

Evidence suggests that 20 mph zones are an effective intervention to reduce casualties from road traffic crashes in urban areas. This analysis compares the costs of construction of the 20 mph zone intervention in high and low casualty areas in London to the value of casualties avoided over 5 and 10 year time horizons. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to quantify uncertainty in the results associated with model parameters. Results indicate a net present value (NPV) of £18 947 (90% credible limits −£75 252 to £82 021 2005 prices) after 5 years and £67 306 (£−29 157 to £137 890) after 10 years when 20 mph zones are implemented in areas with one or more casualty per kilometre of road. Simulations from our model suggest that the ‘threshold of casualties’ where NPVs become positive using a 10 year time horizon is 0.7 casualties per kilometre.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040347

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. 10.1136/bmj.b4469 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.aap.2008.12.009 · DOI
  3. 10.1136/ip.2010.030882 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.aap.2011.03.001 · DOI
  5. Briggs A Sculpher M Claxton K . Decision modelling for health economic evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Steinbach, R., Cairns, J., Grundy, C., & Edwards, P.
Affiliations
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
Corresponding author
Steinbach, Rebecca
Venue
Injury Prevention
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2012-08-30
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
211-213
ISSN
  • 1353-8047 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-5785
OpenAlex
W2134218048
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
4.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Injury Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Road Transport and Highway Systems
Keywords
road traffic casualties, cost-benefit analysis, net present value
MeSH terms
Accident Prevention, Accidents, Traffic, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Humans, London, Time Factors, Urban Health, Models, Econometric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review