Cited by 41Injury Epidemiology and PreventionBurn Injury Management and OutcomesEducation, Safety, and Science Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identifying vulnerable populations to death and injuries from residential fires

Open access
Gilbert, Stanley W, Butry, David T·2018·Injury Prevention

Abstract

Objective: This study proposes and evaluates the theory that people who are susceptible to injury in residential fires are not susceptible to death in residential fires and vice versa. It is proposed that the population vulnerable to death in residential fires can be proxied by ‘frailty’, which is measured as age–gender adjusted fatality rates due to natural causes. Methods: This study uses an ecological approach and controls for exposure to estimate the vulnerability of different population groups to death and injury in residential fires. It allows fatalities and injuries to be estimated by different models. Results: Frailty explains fire-related death in adults while not explaining injuries, which is consistent with the idea that deaths and injuries affect disjoint populations. Conclusions: Deaths and injuries in fire are drawn from different populations. People who are susceptible to dying in fires are unlikely to be injured in fires, and the people who are susceptible to injury are unlikely to die in fires.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/injuryprev-2017-042343

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 16 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 41

Metadata

Authors
Gilbert, S. W., & Butry, D. T.
Affiliations
National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Gilbert, Stanley W
Venue
Injury Prevention
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2017-08-03
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
358-364
ISSN
  • 1353-8047 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-5785
OpenAlex
W2742679178
Cited by
41
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3
FWCI
2.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Injury Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Education, Safety, and Science Studies
Keywords
house fires, fire-related deaths, fire injuries, vulnerability, frailty, injury susceptibility, population heterogeneity
MeSH terms
Frailty, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Burns, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Fires, Housing, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, Population Surveillance, Logistic Models, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Vulnerable Populations, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review