The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The GuideLine Interchange Format: A Model for Representing Guidelines
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To allow exchange of clinical practice guidelines among institutions and computer-based applications. DESIGN: The GuideLine Interchange Format (GLIF) specification consists of GLIF model and the GLIF syntax. The GLIF model is an object-oriented representation that consists of a set of classes for guideline entities, attributes for those classes, and data types for the attribute values. The GLIF syntax specifies the format of the test file that contains the encoding. METHODS: Researchers from the InterMed Collaboratory at Columbia University, Harvard University (Brigham and Women's Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital), and Stanford University analyzed four existing guideline systems to derive a set of requirements for guideline representation. The GLIF specification is a consensus representation developed through a brainstorming process. Four clinical guidelines were encoded in GLIF to assess its expressivity and to study the variability that occurs when two people from different sites encode the same guideline. RESULTS: The encoders reported that GLIF was adequately expressive. A comparison of the encodings revealed substantial variability. CONCLUSION: GLIF was sufficient to model the guidelines for the four conditions that were examined. GLIF needs improvement in standard representation of medical concepts, criterion logic, temporal information, and uncertainty.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Managing Clinical Knowledge for Health Care Improvement
Balas, E. A., & Boren, S. A. (2000) · Yearbook of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1637943 · Cited by 1,479
IT support for healthcare processes – premises, challenges, perspectives
Lenz, R., & Reichert, M. (2007) · Data & Knowledge Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.datak.2006.04.007 · Cited by 521
GEM: A Proposal for a More Comprehensive Guideline Document Model Using XML
Shiffman, R. N., Karras, B. T., Agrawal, A., Chen, R., Marenco, L., & Nath, S. (2000) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/jamia.2000.0070488 · Cited by 277
Shiffman, R. N., Michel, G., Essaihi, A., & Thornquist, E. (2004) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m1444 · Cited by 204
Wright, A., Sittig, D. F., Ash, J. S., Erickson, J. L., Hickman, T. T., Paterno, M., Gebhardt, E., McMullen, C., Tsurikova, R., Dixon, B. E., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.08.008 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Ohno-Machado, L., Gennari, J. H., Murphy, S. N., Jain, N. L., Tu, S. W., Oliver, D. E., Pattison-Gordon, E., Greenes, R. A., Shortliffe, E. H., & Barnett, G. O.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-07-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 357-372
- ISSN
- 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-974X
- OpenAlex
- W1578925735
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 37.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The GuideLine Interchange Format: A Model for Representing Guidelines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jamia.1998.0050357
- The paper
- Ohno-Machado, L., Gennari, J. H., Murphy, S. N., Jain, N. L., Tu, S. W., Oliver, D. E., Pattison-Gordon, E., Greenes, R. A., Shortliffe, E. H., & Barnett, G. O. (1998). The GuideLine Interchange Format: A Model for Representing Guidelines. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. https://doi.org/10.1136/jamia.1998.0050357
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.