The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mucinous subtype as prognostic factor in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) of the colorectum has been known and studied for many years. The prognostic significance of this histological subtype remains controversial. The authors reviewed the prognostic significance of mucinous differentiation in colorectal cancer. Materials and methods: A systematic web-based search was performed using Web of Knowledge and Medline. Articles published in English, German or French which used the WHO definition of MAC and described cohort studies, case–control studies or cross-sectional studies comparing survival in patients with MAC and adenocarcinoma (AC) not otherwise specified were included. Data on first author, year of publication, country, number of patients included, prevalence of MAC, % stage IV disease, % disease located in the proximal colon, mean age at presentation, % male patients and 5-year overall survival were extracted from individual studies. A fixed-effects meta-analysis model was used for analysis. The primary outcome was survival, expressed as the HR. Differences between categorical outcome parameters were quantified using the RR and corresponding 95% CI. Results: 44 studies and 222 256 patients were included. The RR for proximal disease versus distal disease was 1.55 (95% CI 1.53 to 1.58). Mucinous differentiation was less frequent in male subjects (RR 0.93 (95% CI 0.91 to 0.94)). Interestingly, the prevalence of stage IV disease was similar in MAC and AC (RR 0.99 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.02)). Thirty-five articles were included in the survival analysis. A worse survival in MAC versus AC was demonstrated (HR 1.05 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.08)). Conversely, three out of four studies reported a better survival in MAC with microsatellite instability (MSI). Due to heterogeneity a meta-analysis on the effect of MSI was not possible. Conclusion: MAC more often originates from the right colon and is less frequent in male subjects. The authors did not identify a difference in the proportion of stage IV patients at presentation. Mucinous differentiation results in a 2–8% increased hazard of death, which persists after correction for stage. More research is needed to define the interaction between mucinous differentiation, MSI and outcome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Loughrey, M. B. (2020) · Histopathology Reporting · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-27828-1_6 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Verhulst, J., Ferdinande, L., Demetter, P., & Ceelen, W.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Pathology
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2012-01-18
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 381-388
- ISSN
- 0021-9746 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-4146
- OpenAlex
- W2155150109
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mucinous subtype as prognostic factor in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200340
- The paper
- Verhulst, J., Ferdinande, L., Demetter, P., & Ceelen, W. (2012). Mucinous subtype as prognostic factor in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200340
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.