The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A selective medium for isolating Campylobacter jejuni/coli.
Open accessAbstract
Skirrow's medium is effective for isolating Campylobacters from human faeces but is less suitable for animal and environmental specimens owing to the presence of contaminating species. After determining the sensitivity of 104 strains of Campylobacters to several antimicrobial agents, used singly and in various combinations, a selective medium incorporating polymixin, rifampicin, trimethoprim and actidione, was developed. The medium, called Preston medium, was shown to be more selective than Skirrow's medium and suitable for any kind of specimen.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Culture media for the isolation of campylobacters
Corry, J. E. L., Post, D. E., Colin, P., & Laisney, M. J. (1995) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/0168-1605(95)00044-k · Cited by 275
The isolation of salmonellas and campylobacters
Fricker, C. R. (1987) · Journal of Applied Bacteriology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.1987.tb02692.x · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Bolton, F. J., & Robertson, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Pathology
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1982-04
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 462-467
- ISSN
- 0021-9746 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-4146
- OpenAlex
- W2028674783
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 45.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A selective medium for isolating Campylobacter jejuni/coli. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jcp.35.4.462
- The paper
- Bolton, F. J., & Robertson, L. (1982). A selective medium for isolating Campylobacter jejuni/coli. Journal of Clinical Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.35.4.462
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
