Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 437

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Isozymes. Current Topics in Biological and Medical Research

Open access
Moss, DW·1982·Journal of Clinical Pathology

Abstract

tion of tobacco, cancer deaths which can be attributed to occupational factors form a relatively insignificant proportion of the overall cancer mortality.The erroneous concepts and misinterpretations of data which have purported otherwise are judiciously presented.Guidelines for future research and for more careful examination of epidemiological data are presented.Your reviewer, a non-specialist in this field, found the book enthralling and compulsive reading.It is highly commended to any who are in any way involved in or interested in cancer and its causes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jcp.35.9.1040-b

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 437

Metadata

Authors
Moss, D.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Pathology
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1982-09
Volume
35
Issue
9
Pages
1040.2-1040
ISSN
  • 0021-9746 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-4146
OpenAlex
W3168192185
Cited by
437
References
0
FWCI
14.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Isozymes. Current Topics in Biological and Medical Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jcp.35.9.1040-b
The paper
Moss, D. (1982). Isozymes. Current Topics in Biological and Medical Research. Journal of Clinical Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.35.9.1040-b

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.