Cited by 120Youth Education and Societal DynamicsHealth disparities and outcomesEducational Outcomes and Influences

School dropout: a major public health challenge: a 10-year prospective study on medical and non-medical social insurance benefits in young adulthood, the Young-HUNT 1 Study (Norway)

De Ridder, Karin A A, Pape, Kristine, Johnsen, Roar, Westin, Steinar, Holmen, Turid Lingaas, Bjørngaard, Johan Håkon·2012·Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Abstract

Background School and work participation in adolescence and young adulthood are important for future health and socioeconomic status. The authors studied the association between self-rated health in adolescents, high school dropout and long-term receipt of medical and non-medical social insurance benefits in young adulthood. Methods Self-rated health in adolescence was assessed in 8795 adolescents participating in the Norwegian Young-HUNT Study (1995-1997). Linkages to the National Education Database and the National Insurance Administration allowed identification of school dropout and receipt of long-term medical and non-medical benefits during a 10-year follow-up (1998-2007). The data were explored by descriptive statistics and by multinomial logistic regression. Results A total of 17% was registered as being high school dropouts at age 24. The predicted 5-year risk of receiving benefits between ages 24-28 was 21% (95% CI 20% to 23%). High school dropouts had a 5-year risk of receiving benefits of 44% (95% CI 41 to 48) compared with 16% (95% CI 15 to 17) in those who completed high school (adjusted for self-rated health, parental education and sex). There was a 27% school dropout rate in adolescents who reported poor health compared with 16% in those who reported good health. The predicted 5-year risk of receiving any long-term social insurance benefits in adolescents who reported poor health was 33% (95% CI 30 to 37) compared with 20% (95% CI 19 to 21) in those who reporte…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jech-2011-200047

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Ridder, K. A. A., Pape, K., Johnsen, R., Westin, S., Holmen, T. L., & Bjørngaard, J. H.
Affiliations
  • Department of Public Health and General Practice, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Venue
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2012-02-06
Volume
66
Issue
11
Pages
995-1000
ISSN
  • 0141-7681 (ISSN-L)
  • 0143-005X
  • 1470-2738
OpenAlex
W2126669756
Cited by
120
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 4
FWCI
33.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
Keywords
school dropout, high school dropout, self-rated health, adolescents, early adulthood, social insurance benefits, medical benefits, work integration, socioeconomic status, public health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Status, Humans, Insurance, Health, Male, Norway, Prospective Studies, Public Health, Risk Factors, Social Problems, Social Security, Socioeconomic Factors, Student Dropouts, Logistic Models, Young Adult, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review