Cited by 26Health Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionHealth disparities and outcomesGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

Educational inequalities in blood pressure and cholesterol screening in nine European countries

Rodin, Danielle, Stirbu, Irina, Ekholm, Ola, Dzurova, Dagmar, Costa, Giuseppe, Mackenbach, Johan P, Kunst, Anton E·2012·Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Abstract

Background To perform the first European overview of educational inequalities in the use of blood pressure and cholesterol screening. Methods Data were obtained on the use of screening services according to educational level from nationally representative cross-sectional surveys in Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Hungary, Italy, Latvia and Lithuania. Screening rates were examined in the preceding 12 months and 5 years, for respondents 35+ years (45+ for women). ORs comparing low- to high-educated respondents were estimated using logistic regression controlling for age. Results Inequalities in cholesterol screening favouring higher socioeconomic groups were demonstrated with statistical significance among men in four countries, whereby men with higher education were more likely to receive screening, with 1.22 as the highest OR. Among women, a similar pattern was found. Inequalities in blood pressure screening were even smaller and less often statistically significant. Hungary was the only country with higher rates of both types of screening in the low-educated group. In other countries, pro-high inequalities were slightly increased after controlling for self-rated health. Conclusions All European countries in this study had small educational inequalities in the utilisation of blood pressure and cholesterol screening. These inequalities are smaller than those previously observed in the USA. Further comparative studies need to distinguish between screening fo…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jech-2011-200273

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Additional studies found that socioeconomically deprived individuals were less likely to receive CVD preventive screening, but these studies were performed outside the U.S. and did not stratify individuals by existing CVD status.

    “Additional studies examining preventive screening for CVD have found that socioeconomically deprived individuals were less likely to receive CVD preventive screening, but these studies were performed in countries outside of the U.S. and also did not stratify individuals based on existing CVD status [29], [30], [31].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rodin, D., Stirbu, I., Ekholm, O., Dzurova, D., Costa, G., Mackenbach, J. P., & Kunst, A. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
  • Faculty of Sciences, Charles University Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
  • University of Turin (IT)
Corresponding author
Rodin, Danielle
Venue
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2012-01-12
Volume
66
Issue
11
Pages
1050-1055
ISSN
  • 0141-7681 (ISSN-L)
  • 0143-005X
  • 1470-2738
OpenAlex
W2032682543
Cited by
26
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
educational inequality, health disparities, blood pressure screening, cholesterol screening, cardiovascular screening, socioeconomic status, self-rated health, European comparison
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Blood Pressure, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cholesterol, Cross-Sectional Studies, Educational Status, Europe, Female, Health Services Needs and Demand, Health Services Research, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Preventive Health Services, Socioeconomic Factors, Logistic Models, Health Care Surveys, Healthcare Disparities, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review