P109 Cumulative exposure to racial discrimination across time and domains: exploring racism’s long term impact on the mental health of ethnic minority people in the UK
Abstract
Background International evidence documents that experiencing racial discrimination is associated with poor physical and mental health among ethnic minority people, but there is a gap in our understanding of how the accumulation of exposure to racial discrimination, over time and across domains of exposure, is associated with increased morbidity. In this study we examined the longitudinal association between cumulative exposure to racial discrimination and changes in the mental health of ethnic minority people in the UK. Methods We apply linear regression models to data from four waves (2009 to 2013) of the United Kingdom (UK) Household Longitudinal Study. Models adjusted for sex, age, household income, and previous psychological distress, which we measured with the mental component of the Short-Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12). Results Ethnic minority people who reported exposure to racial discrimination at one time point had SF-12 scores 1.93 (CI = −3.31, −0.56) points lower than those who reported no exposure to racial discrimination, whereas those who had been exposed to two or more domains of racial discrimination, at two different time points, had SF-12 scores 8.26 (CI = −13.33, −3.18) points lower than those who had reported no experiences of racial discrimination. Controlling for racial discrimination and other socioeconomic factors reduced ethnic inequalities in mental health. Conclusion Cumulative exposure to racial discrimination has incremental negative long-term effects on the mental health of ethnic minority people in the UK. Studies that examine exposure of racial discrimination at one point in time underestimate the contribution of racism on health.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cumulative impact of racial trauma has been demonstrated in BIPOC communities in North America, Europe, and Oceania.
“The cumulative impact of racial trauma was demonstrated in BIPOC communities in North America, Europe, and Oceania”
From Complex Racial Trauma: Evidence, Theory, Assessment, and Treatment (2023) · cites this paper as Becares et al., 2016
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Complex Racial Trauma: Evidence, Theory, Assessment, and Treatment
Cénat, J. M. (2023) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916221120428 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
“The cumulative impact of racial trauma was demonstrated in BIPOC communities in North America, Europe, and Oceania (Becares et al., 2016; Hollinsworth, 2006; Wallace et al., 2016; Williams, Metzger, et al., 2018).”
Background
- Authors
- Becares, L., Wallace, S., & Nazroo, J.
- Affiliations
- Centre on Dynamics of Ethnicity, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- University of Manchester (GB)
- ORCID
- Nazroo, J
- Venue
- Posters
- Publisher
- BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
- Published
- 2016-09
- Pages
- A101.2-A101
- OpenAlex
- W2519883172
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/K002198/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
- Keywords
- racial discrimination, cumulative exposure, ethnic minority mental health, psychological distress, ethnic health disparities, racism, SF-12
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review