Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 323

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of social networks on 10 year survival in very old Australians: the Australian longitudinal study of aging

Open access
Giles, Lynne C, Glonek, Gary F V, Luszcz, Mary A, Andrews, Gary R·2005·Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Abstract

Study objectives: To examine if social networks with children, relatives, friends, and confidants predict survival in older Australians over 10 years after controlling for a range of demographic, health, and lifestyle variables. Design: Prospective longitudinal cohort study (the Australian longitudinal study of aging) Setting: Adelaide, South Australia. Participants: 1477 persons aged 70 years or more living in the community and residential care facilities. Main results: After controlling for a range of demographic, health, and lifestyle variables, greater networks with friends were protective against mortality in the 10 year follow up period. The hazard ratio for participants in the highest tertile of friends networks compared with participants in the lowest group was 0.78 (95%CI 0.65 to 0.92). A smaller effect of greater networks with confidants (hazard ratio = 0.84; 95%CI = 0.71 to 0.98) was seen. The effects of social networks with children and relatives were not significant with respect to survival over the following decade. Conclusions: Survival time may be enhanced by strong social networks. Among older Australians, these may be important in lengthening survival.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jech.2004.025429

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. 1989, Am J Epidemiol, 128, 370
  2. 1985, Lancet, i, 915
  3. 1991, Am J Epidemiol, 133, 901
  4. 10.1093/geront/32.1.104 · doi:10.1093/geront/32.1.104
  5. 2002, J Cancer Epidemiol Prev, 7, 195
  6. 10.1037/0882-7974.12.2.340 · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.12.2.340
  7. 10.1037/0882-7974.16.1.3 · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.16.1.3 · Paper page
  8. 1972, J Stat Soc Series B, 34, 187, 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.2307/2286217 · DOI
  10. 1997, Psychol Aging, 12, 340, 10.1037/0882-7974.12.2.340 · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.12.2.340

Cited by

See all 323

Metadata

Authors
Giles, L. C., Glonek, G. F. V., Luszcz, M. A., & Andrews, G. R.
Venue
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2005-06-17
Volume
59
Issue
7
Pages
574-579
ISSN
  • 0141-7681 (ISSN-L)
  • 0143-005X
  • 1470-2738
OpenAlex
W2072540088
Cited by
323
References
53
FWCI
14.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of social networks on 10 year survival in very old Australians: the Australian longitudinal study of aging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jech.2004.025429
The paper
Giles, L. C., Glonek, G. F. V., Luszcz, M. A., & Andrews, G. R. (2005). Effect of social networks on 10 year survival in very old Australians: the Australian longitudinal study of aging. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.025429

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.