Cited by 169History of Science and MedicineHistory of Emotions ResearchHistory of Medicine and Tropical Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dirt, disgust and disease: a natural history of hygiene

Open access
Curtis, Valerie A·2007·Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Abstract

Hygiene has been studied from multiple perspectives, including that of history. I define hygiene as the set of behaviours that animals, including humans, use to avoid infection. I argue that it has an ancient evolutionary history, and that most animals exhibit such behaviours because they were adaptive. In humans, the avoidance of infectious threats is motivated by the emotion of disgust. Intuition about hygiene, dirt and disease can be found underlying belief about health and disease throughout history. Purification ritual, miasma, contagion, zymotic and germ theories of disease are ideas that spread through society because they are intuitively attractive, because they are supported by evidence either from direct experience or from authoritative report and because they are consistent with existing beliefs. In contrast to much historical and anthropological assertion, I argue that hygiene behaviour and disgust predate culture and so cannot fully be explained as its product. The history of ideas about disease thus is neither entirely socially constructed nor an “heroic progress” of scientists leading the ignorant into the light. As an animal behaviour the proper domain of hygiene is biology, and without this perspective attempts at explanation are incomplete. The approaches of biological anthropology have much to offer the practice of cultural history.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jech.2007.062380

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 44 references

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. 1997, J Hist Med, 52, 7
  2. Hölldobbler B, Wilson EO. The ants. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.
  3. 1983, Am Bee J, 123, 511
  4. 2003, Wildlife Soc Bull, 31, 117
  5. 1971, Nature, 5321, 538
  6. Burkert W. Greek religion. Oxford: Blackwell, 1985.
  7. Aunger R. The Electric meme. New York: The Free Press, 2002.
  8. Parker R. Miasma: pollution and purity in early Greek religion. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983.
  9. Hippocrates. Hippocratic writings. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1983.
  10. 1985, Victorian Stud, 28, 381
  11. 1997, J Hist Med, 52, 114
  12. 1994, Cahiers Santé, 4, 335

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–169 of 169

Metadata

Authors
Curtis, V. A.
Venue
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2007-07-13
Volume
61
Issue
8
Pages
660-664
ISSN
  • 0141-7681 (ISSN-L)
  • 0143-005X
  • 1470-2738
OpenAlex
W2010209884
Cited by
169
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Unilever
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History of Science and Medicine
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › History of Emotions Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › History of Medicine and Tropical Health
Keywords
hygiene, disgust, dirt, disease, infection avoidance, animal behavior, germ theory, miasma theory, contagion theory, purification rituals, history of medicine, cultural history, physical anthropology, social construction of illness
MeSH terms
Animals, Attitude to Health, Behavior, Animal, Culture, Emotions, Humans, Hygiene, Parasitology, Public Health, Health Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review