The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Swedish two county trial of mammographic screening for breast cancer: recent results and calculation of benefit.
Open accessAbstract
The Swedish two county trial of breast cancer screening is now in its tenth year. This paper presents detailed results on mortality from breast cancer and from all other causes, and on the population denominators at risk for each of the first 8 years of follow up, for each county separately. These data represent a two year update on the last major report. Results show an increasingly significant deficit in deaths from breast cancer among the 77,092 women invited to screening relative to the 56,000 not invited (RR = 0.68, p = 0.002), with no significant difference between the effects of screening in the two counties (p = 0.5). These results remain the same when adjusted for age. Analysis of all cause deaths shows no significant effect of screening (p = 0.5), nor was there any significant effect of screening on deaths from all causes other than breast cancer (p = 0.9). The rates of deaths from intercurrent illness in breast cancer cases were almost identical in the group invited to screening and the group not invited (p = 0.7). This result remained the same when adjusted for age. We calculate that in the age group 50-69 at entry, one breast cancer death was prevented per 4000 woman/years, per 1460 mammographic examinations, per 13.5 biopsies, and per 7.4 breast cancers detected.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable?
Gøtzsche, P. C., & Olsen, O. (2000) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)06065-1 · Cited by 853
Tabar, L., Yen, M.-F., Vitak, B., Chen, H.-H. T., Smith, R. A., & Duffy, S. W. (2003) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13143-1 · Cited by 742
Self-citationUPDATE OF THE SWEDISH TWO-COUNTY PROGRAM OF MAMMOGRAPHIC SCREENING FOR BREAST CANCER
Tabàr, L., Fagerberg, G., Duffy, S. W., Day, N. E., Gad, A., & Gröntoft, O. (1992) · Radiologic Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0033-8389(22)02494-0 · Cited by 731
Self-citationPotential Contribution of Computer-aided Detection to the Sensitivity of Screening Mammography
Warren Burhenne, L. J., Wood, S. A., D'Orsi, C. J., Feig, S. A., Kopans, D. B., O'Shaughnessy, K. F., Sickles, E. A., Tabar, L., Vyborny, C. J., & Castellino, R. A. (2000) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.215.2.r00ma15554 · Cited by 554
Self-citationBarton, M. B., Harris, R., & Fletcher, S. W. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.13.1270 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Tabar, L., Fagerberg, G., Duffy, S. W., & Day, N. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1989-06
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 107-114
- ISSN
- 0141-7681 (ISSN-L)
- 0143-005X
- 1470-2738
- OpenAlex
- W2001043801
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Swedish two county trial of mammographic screening for breast cancer: recent results and calculation of benefit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jech.43.2.107
- The paper
- Tabar, L., Fagerberg, G., Duffy, S. W., & Day, N. E. (1989). The Swedish two county trial of mammographic screening for breast cancer: recent results and calculation of benefit. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.43.2.107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.