The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Parental smoking and the nutrient intake and food choice of British teenagers aged 16-17 years.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between parental smoking habits and the nutrient intake and food choice of teenagers aged 16-17 years, allowing for differences in teenage smoking and the social class and regional distribution of the participants. DESIGN: Data were collected from the 1970 longitudinal birth cohort, cross-sectionally at 16-17 years. The smoking habits of teenagers were evaluated from a questionnaire completed by the subjects themselves, and the smoking habits of parents by interview. The nutrient and food intakes of teenagers were quantitatively assessed using a four day unweighed dietary diary. SETTING: The participants were distributed throughout Britain. PARTICIPANTS: A subsample of 1222 males and 1735 females was isolated from respondents to the 1970 birth cohort 16-17 year data collection sweep undertaken in 1986-87. MAIN RESULTS: Parental smoking habits were associated with different dietary patterns among teenagers regardless of whether the teenagers themselves smoked. Dietary differences noted were similar to those observed previously among smokers, with lower intakes of fibre, vitamin C, vitamin E, folates, and magnesium in particular reported among both males and females in households where parents were smokers. These lower intakes were associated with lower intakes of fruit juices, wholemeal bread, and some vegetables. CONCLUSION: Teenagers who lived with parents who smoked had different nutrient and food intakes to those with non-smoking parents, and teenagers exposed to parental smoking appeared to have similar dietary patterns to teenagers who themselves smoked.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, as children also tend to copy the eating habits of their parents, this will be detrimental in the children of smokers, as smokers are more likely to choose foods low in fiber, vitamins and minerals, and high in monounsaturated fatty acids, starch, as well as sugar-sweetened soft drinks (Crawley and While, 1996; Rogers et al., 2003).”
From Cigarette Smoking and Brain Regulation of Energy Homeostasis (2012) · cites this paper as Crawley and While, 1996
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Longitudinal tracking of adolescent smoking, physical activity, and food choice behaviors
Kelder, S. H., Perry, C. L., Klepp, K. I., & Lytle, L. L. (1994) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.84.7.1121 · Cited by 1,388
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Margetts BA, Jackson AA. Interactions between people's diet and their smoking habits: The dietary and nutritional survey of British adults. BMJ7 1993;307:1381-84.
- Bolton-Smith C, Woodward M, Brown CA, Smith WCS, Tunstall-Pedoe H. Nutrient intakes from current, exand never smokers: results from the Scottish heart health study. Proc Nutr Soc 1991;50:36A. 3 Cade J, Margetts B. Smoking and diet: is the diet of smokers different? Proc Nutr Soc 1990;49:41A. 4 Whichelow MJ, Erzinclioglu SW. Comparison of the diets of smokers and non-smokers. Proc Nutr Soc 1990;49:42A. 5 Fehily AM, Phillips KM, Yarnell JWG. Diet, smoking, social class and body mass index in the Caerphilly heart disease study. Am J Clin Nutr 1984;40:827-33.
- Crawley HF, While D. The dietary habits and body weight of British teenage smokers aged 16-17 years. Eur3_ Clin Nutr 1995;49:904-14.
- Prattala R. Young people and food: socio-cultural studies offood consumption patterns. Helsinki: University Helsinki, 1989. PhD thesis.
- Chamberlain R, Chamberlain G, Howlett B, Claireaux. British births 1970. Vol. 1: The first week of life. London: Heinemann Medical Books Ltd, 1975.
- Crawley HF. The energy, nutrient and food intakes of teenagers aged 16-17 years in Britain. 1. Energy, macronutrients and non-starch polysaccharides. BrJ Nutr 1993; 70:15-26. · DOI
- Borelli R, Cole TJ, Di Base G, Contaldo F. Some statistical considerations on dietary assessment methods. EurJr Clin Nutr 1988;43:453-63.
- Black AE, Goldberg GR, Jebb SA, Livingstone MBE, Cole TJ, Prentice AM. Critical evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principles of energy physiology: 2. Evaluating the results of published surveys. Eur 7 Clin Nutr 1991;45:583-99.
- Beverley BR, Day I, Ide L. Smoking in children in Great Britain. London: Social Sciences Research Council/Medical Research Council, 1972.
- Payne CD. The GLIM system: release 3.77. Oxford: National Algorithms Group, 1985.
- Pearson R, Richardson K. The smoking habits of 16 year olds in the national child development study. Public Health 1978;92: 136-44. · DOI
- Townsend J, Wilkes H, Haines A, Jarvis M. Adolescent smokers seen in general practice: health, lifestyle, physical measurements, and response to anti-smoking advice. BMJ 1991;303:947-50. · DOI
- Bingham S. The dietary assessment ofindividuals: methods, acuracy, new techniques and recommendations. NurrAbstr Rev 1987;57A:705-42.
- Charlton A. Children and passive smoking: A review. 7 Fam Pract 1994;38:267-77.
- Kallner AB, Hartmann D, Homig D. On the requirements of ascorbic acid in man: steady state turnover and body pool. Am J Clin Nutr 1981;34:1347-55. · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Cigarette Smoking and Brain Regulation of Energy Homeostasis
Chen, H., Saad, S., Sandow, S. L., & Bertrand, P. P. (2012) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2012.00147 · Cited by 69
Stephenson, E. J., Ragauskas, A., Jaligama, S., Redd, J. R., Parvathareddy, J., Peloquin, M. J., Saravia, J., Han, J. C., Cormier, S. A., & Bridges, D. (2016) · American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00521.2015 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Crawley, H. F., & While, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 306-312
- ISSN
- 0143-005X
- 1470-2738
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
