Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 181

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Modelling inequality in reported long term illness in the UK: combining individual and area characteristics.

Open access
Shouls, S, Congdon, P, Curtis, S·1996·Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the nature of the relation between health and social factors at both the aggregated scale of geographical areas and the individual scale. DESIGN AND SETTING: The individual data are derived from the sample of anonymised records (SAR) from the census of 1991 in Great Britain, and are combined with area data from this census. The ecological setting (context) was defined using multivariate methods to classify the 278 districts of residence identifiable in the SAR. The outcome health variable is the 1991 census long-term limiting illness question. Health variations were analysed by multilevel logistic regression to examine the compositional variation (at the level of the individual) and the contextual variation (variability operating at the level of districts) in reported illness. PARTICIPANTS: 10 per cent randomised subsample of the SAR who are aged 16+ and are resident in households. MAIN RESULTS: The multi-level modelling revealed that area factors have a significant association with individual health outcome but their effect is smaller than that of individual attributes. The results show evidence for both compositional and contextual effects in the pattern of variation in propensity to report illness. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest generally higher levels of ill health for individuals who are older, not married, in a semi/unskilled manual social class, and socioeconomically deprived (as measured by a composite deprivation score). All individuals living in areas with high levels of illness (which tend to be more deprived areas) show greater morbidity, even after allowing for their individual characteristics. However, within affluent areas, where morbidity was generally lower, the health inequality (health gradient) between rich and poor individuals was particularly strong. We consider the implications of these findings for health and resource allocation policy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jech.50.3.366

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 181

Metadata

Authors
Shouls, S., Congdon, P., & Curtis, S.
Venue
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1996-06
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
366-376
ISSN
  • 0141-7681 (ISSN-L)
  • 0143-005X
  • 1470-2738
OpenAlex
W2106090848
Cited by
181
References
1
FWCI
12.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.