The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Employment grade differences in cause specific mortality. A 25 year follow up of civil servants from the first Whitehall study
Open accessAbstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that the association between socioeconomic status and mortality rates cuts across the major causes of death for middle aged and elderly men. DESIGN: 25 year follow up of mortality in relation to employment grade. SETTING: The first Whitehall study. PARTICIPANTS: 18 001 male civil servants aged 40–69 years who attended the initial screening between 1967 and 1970 and were followed up for at least 25 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Specific causes of death. RESULTS: After more than 25 years of follow up of civil servants, aged 40–69 years at entry to the study, employment grade differences still exist in total mortality and for nearly all specific causes of death. Main risk factors (cholesterol, smoking, systolic blood pressure, glucose intolerance and diabetes) could only explain one third of this gradient. Comparing the older retired group with the younger pre-retirement group, the differentials in mortality remained but were less pronounced. The largest decline was seen for chronic bronchitis, gastrointestinal diseases and genitourinary diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Differentials in mortality persist at older ages for almost all causes of death.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Socioeconomic factors and cardiovascular disease: a review of the literature.
Kaplan, G. A., & Keil, J. E. (1993) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.88.4.1973 · Cited by 1,845
Marmot, M., Bosma, H., Hemingway, H., Brunner, E., & Stansfeld, S. (1997) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)04244-x · Cited by 1,291
Self-citationMarmot, M. G., & Shipley, M. J. (1996) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.313.7066.1177 · Cited by 437
Self-citation
Cited by
Marmot, M. (2004) · Significance · doi:10.1111/j.1740-9713.2004.00058.x · Cited by 917
Self-citationBehavioral science at the crossroads in public health: Extending horizons, envisioning the future
Glass, T. A., & McAtee, M. J. (2006) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.044 · Cited by 821
Cohort Profile: The Whitehall II study
Marmot, M., & Brunner, E. (2005) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyh372 · Cited by 788
Self-citationStatus Syndrome: A Challenge to Medicine
Marmot, M. G. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.295.11.1304 · Cited by 372
Self-citationThe role of psychobiological pathways in socio-economic inequalities in cardiovascular disease risk
Steptoe, A. (2002) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1053/euhj.2001.2611 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- van Rossum, C. T. M., Shipley, M. J., van de Mheen, H., Grobbee, D. E., & Marmot, M. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2000-03-01
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 178-184
- ISSN
- 0141-7681 (ISSN-L)
- 0143-005X
- 1470-2738
- OpenAlex
- W2108853246
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Employment grade differences in cause specific mortality. A 25 year follow up of civil servants from the first Whitehall study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jech.54.3.178
- The paper
- van Rossum, C. T. M., Shipley, M. J., van de Mheen, H., Grobbee, D. E., & Marmot, M. G. (2000). Employment grade differences in cause specific mortality. A 25 year follow up of civil servants from the first Whitehall study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.54.3.178
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.