Do doctors owe a special duty of beneficence to their patients?
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The interests of patients and medical practitioners remain aligned at some fundamental level which encourages solidarity and trust.
“the interests of patients and medical practitioners remain aligned at some fundamental level which encourages solidarity and trust.”
From Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI (2019) · cites this paper as [19]
These standards provide a historically sensitive account of the obligations of the profession against which negligent conduct and practices can be identified.
“Nonetheless, they provide a historically sensitive account of the obligations of the profession against which negligent conduct and practices can be identified.”
From Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI (2019) · cites this paper as [19]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI
Mittelstadt, B. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0114-4 · Cited by 1,886 · see citing works
Gillon, R. (2015) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2014-102282 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Self-citationAI Ethics – Too Principled to Fail?
Mittelstadt, B. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3391293 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gillon, R.
- Corresponding author
- Gillon, R
- ORCID
- Gillon, R
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Ethics
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1986-12
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 171-173
- ISSN
- 0306-6800 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-4257
- PMC
- PMC1375378
- OpenAlex
- W2116640971
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Medical Ethics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical and Health Sciences Research
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- duty of beneficence, physician-patient relationship, medical ethics, physician obligations, patient well-being
- MeSH terms
- Ethics, Medical, Hippocratic Oath, Humans, Motivation, Physician-Patient Relations, Beneficence, Moral Obligations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
