A new mutation resulting in the truncation of the TRAF6-interacting domain of XEDAR: a possible novel cause of hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia: Figure 1
Abstract
Hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (HED) is caused by mutations in the genes encoding the components of the tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα)-like signalling pathway and is characterised by aberrant differentiation of tooth buds, hair follicles and eccrine sweat glands which leads to the characteristic HED phenotype. Numerous mutations in the EDA (ectodysplasin-A) gene have been reported while EDA1R (ectodysplasin-1 receptor) or EDARADD (ectodysplasin-A receptor-associated adapter protein) defects are rare. Relatively frequent mutations of NEMO (NF-κ-B essential modulator) detected in HED patients are accompanied by immunodeficiency and incontinentia pigmenti.1 Recently we reported a possibly causative novel mutation of TRAF6 (TNF receptor associated factor6) in a patient displaying mild symptoms typical of HED.2 The most common form of HED is caused by mutations in the EDA which encodes the ligand for specific receptors. Two major isoforms of the EDA gene product, originating from differential splicing of the primary transcript, were detected. Ectodysplasin-A1 (EDA-A1) is recognised by EDA1R leading to the recruitment of an adaptor protein, EDARADD, while ectodysplasin-A2 (EDA-A2), which is shorter than EDA-A1 by two amino acids, is recognised by EDA2R (XEDAR).3 The extracellular domain of XEDAR exhibits 32% …
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Alterations in any of these genes can produce a phenotype resembling XLHED, and heterozygosity, compound heterozygosity, or homozygosity can cause the disorders.
“Pathogenic alterations in any of these genes can result in a clinical phenotype similar to XLHED, and both heterozygosity and compound heterozygosity or homozygosity for these can cause the disorders.”
From Ectodermal dysplasias: Classification and organization by phenotype, genotype and molecular pathway. (2019) · cites this paper as Wisniewski and Trzeciak 2012
Later, similar hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia phenotypes were linked to defects in EDAR and the adaptor proteins EDARADD and TRAF6.
“Following this discovery, the causes of other hypohidrotic ED conditions with similar phenotypes were discovered in defects of the EDA receptor (EDAR) and the adaptor proteins EDARADD “EDAR-associated death domain” [Headon and others 2001] and TRAF6 “TNF receptor-associated factor 6”. [Wisniewski and Trzeciak 2012] [Chassaing and others 2006]”
From Ectodermal dysplasias: Classification and organization by phenotype, genotype and molecular pathway. (2019) · cites this paper as Wisniewski and Trzeciak 2012
Conditions once thought unrelated can arise from allelic mutations that produce markedly different clinical phenotypes, such as TP63-associated syndromes.
“Conditions previously thought to be unrelated can result from allelic mutations that lead to markedly different clinical phenotypes (e.g. TP63-associated syndromes).[Rostagno and others 2010; Wisniewski and Trzeciak 2012]”
From Ectodermal dysplasias: Classification and organization by phenotype, genotype and molecular pathway. (2019) · cites this paper as Wisniewski and Trzeciak 2012
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ectodermal dysplasias: Classification and organization by phenotype, genotype and molecular pathway.
Wright, J. T., Fete, M., Schneider, H., Zinser, M., Koster, M. I., Clarke, A. J., Hadj‐Rabia, S., Tadini, G., Pagnan, N., Visinoni, A. F., et al. (2019) · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A · doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.61045 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
“Conditions previously thought to be unrelated can result from allelic mutations that lead to markedly different clinical phenotypes (e.g., TP63-associated syndromes) (Rostagno et al., 2010; Wisniewski & Trzeciak, 2012).”
BackgroundWohlfart, S., Hammersen, J., & Schneider, H. (2016) · Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/jhg.2016.75 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wisniewski, S. A., & Trzeciak, W. H.
- Affiliations
- 1Faculty of Public Health, College of Education and Administration, Poznan, Poland
- Corresponding author
- Trzeciak, Wieslaw Henryk
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Genetics
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2012-08
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 499-501
- ISSN
- 0022-2593 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-6244
- OpenAlex
- W2081869050
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 0.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Medical Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › dental development and anomalies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and rare skin diseases.
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Hair Growth and Disorders
- Keywords
- hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia, EDARADD, TRAF6, EDA gene, ectoderm differentiation, sweat gland differentiation, hair follicle differentiation, novel mutations, protein truncation
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Amino Acid Sequence, DNA Mutational Analysis, Eccrine Glands, Ectodermal Dysplasia, Humans, Male, Molecular Sequence Data, Genome, Human, Sequence Deletion, TNF Receptor-Associated Factor 6, Xedar Receptor, Protein Interaction Domains and Motifs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review