Cited by 311Genetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersGenomics and Rare DiseasesHereditary Neurological Disorders

Methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 ( MECP2 ) mutation type is associated with disease severity in Rett syndrome

Open access
Cuddapah, Vishnu Anand, Pillai, Rajesh B, Shekar, Kiran V, Lane, Jane B, Motil, Kathleen J, Skinner, Steven A, Tarquinio, Daniel Charles, Glaze, Daniel G +5 more·2014·Journal of Medical Genetics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rett syndrome (RTT), a neurodevelopmental disorder that primarily affects girls, is characterised by a period of apparently normal development until 6-18 months of age when motor and communication abilities regress. More than 95% of individuals with RTT have mutations in methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MECP2), whose protein product modulates gene transcription. Surprisingly, although the disorder is caused by mutations in a single gene, disease severity in affected individuals can be quite variable. To explore the source of this phenotypic variability, we propose that specific MECP2 mutations lead to different degrees of disease severity. METHODS: Using a database of 1052 participants assessed over 4940 unique visits, the largest cohort of both typical and atypical RTT patients studied to date, we examined the relationship between MECP2 mutation status and various phenotypic measures over time. RESULTS: In general agreement with previous studies, we found that particular mutations, such as p.Arg133Cys, p.Arg294X, p.Arg306Cys, 3° truncations and other point mutations, were relatively less severe in both typical and atypical RTT. In contrast, p.Arg106Trp, p.Arg168X, p.Arg255X, p.Arg270X, splice sites, deletions, insertions and deletions were significantly more severe. We also demonstrated that, for most mutation types, clinical severity increases with age. Furthermore, of the clinical features of RTT, ambulation, hand use and age at onset of stereotypies are strongly linked to overall disease severity. CONCLUSIONS: We have confirmed that MECP2 mutation type is a strong predictor of disease severity. These data also indicate that clinical severity continues to become progressively worse regardless of initial severity. These findings will allow clinicians and families to anticipate and prepare better for the needs of individuals with RTT.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jmedgenet-2013-102113

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MECP2 mutation status is a strong predictor of disease severity.

    “Therefore, MECP2 mutation status is a strong predictor of disease severity, but phenotype variation commonly occurs between individuals with the same MECP2 mutation and is attributed to differences in X chromosome inactivation (XCI) [97].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Amir RE Zoghbi HY Rett syndrome: methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 mutations and phenotype-genotype correlations Am J Med Genet 2000 97 147 52 11180222
  2. Archer H Evans J Leonard H Colvin L Ravine D Christodoulou J Williamson S Charman T Bailey ME Sampson J de KN Clarke A Correlation between clinical severity in patients with Rett syndrome with a p.R168X or p. T158M MECP2 mutation, and the direction and degree of skewing of X-chromosome inactivation J Med Genet 2007 44 148 52 16905679 PMC2598067
  3. Ariani F Hayek G Rondinella D Artuso R Mencarelli MA Spanhol-Rosseto A Pollazzon M Buoni S Spiga O Ricciardi S Meloni I Longo I Mari F Broccoli V Zappella M Renieri A FOXG1 is responsible for the congenital variant of Rett syndrome Am J Hum Genet 2008 83 89 93 18571142 PMC2443837
  4. Bebbington A Anderson A Ravine D Fyfe S Pineda M de KN Ben-Zeev B Yatawara N Percy A Kaufmann WE Leonard H Investigating genotype-phenotype relationships in Rett syndrome using an international data set Neurology 2008 70 868 75 18332345
  5. Charman T Neilson TC Mash V Archer H Gardiner MT Knudsen GP McDonnell A Perry J Whatley SD Bunyan DJ Ravn K Mount RH Hastings RP Hulten M Orstavik KH Reilly S Cass H Clarke A Kerr AM Bailey ME Dimensional phenotypic analysis and functional categorisation of mutations reveal novel genotype-phenotype associations in Rett syndrome Eur J Hum Genet 2005 13 1121 30 16077736
  6. Colvin L Fyfe S Leonard S Schiavello T Ellaway C de KN Christodoulou J Msall M Leonard H Describing the phenotype in Rett syndrome using a population database Arch Dis Child 2003 88 38 43 12495959 PMC1719276
  7. Colvin L Leonard H de KN Davis M Weaving L Williamson S Christodoulou J Refining the phenotype of common mutations in Rett syndrome J Med Genet 2004 41 25 30 14729826 PMC1757244
  8. Gibson JH Williamson SL Arbuckle S Christodoulou J X chromosome inactivation patterns in brain in Rett syndrome: implications for the disease phenotype Brain Dev 2005 27 266 70 15862188
  9. Glaze DG Percy AK Skinner S Motil KJ Neul JL Barrish JO Lane JB Geerts SP Annese F Graham J McNair L Lee HS Epilepsy and the natural history of Rett syndrome Neurology 2010 74 909 12 20231667 PMC2836870
  10. Halbach NS Smeets EE van den Braak N van Roozendaal KE Blok RM Schrander-Stumpel CT Frijns JP Maaskant MA Curfs LM Genotype-phenotype relationships as prognosticators in Rett syndrome should be handled with care in clinical practice Am J Med Genet A 2012 158A 2 340 50 22190343
  11. Jian L Nagarajan L de KN Ravine D Christodoulou J Leonard H Seizures in Rett syndrome: an overview from a one-year calendar study Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2007 11 310 17 17433737 PMC3013620
  12. Kerr AM Nomura Y Armstrong D Anvret M Belichenko PV Budden S Cass H Christodoulou J Clarke A Ellaway C d’Esposito M Francke U Hulten M Julu P Leonard H Naidu S Schanen C Webb T Engerstrom IW Yamashita Y Segawa M Guidelines for reporting clinical features in cases with MECP2 mutations Brain Dev 2001 23 208 11 11376997
  13. Laurvick CL de KN Bower C Christodoulou J Ravine D Ellaway C Williamson S Leonard H Rett syndrome in Australia: a review of the epidemiology J Pediatr 2006 148 347 52 16615965
  14. Leonard H Colvin L Christodoulou J Schiavello T Williamson S Davis M Ravine D Fyfe S de KN Matsuishi T Kondo I Clarke A Hackwell S Yamashita Y Patients with the R133C mutation: is their phenotype different from patients with Rett syndrome with other mutations? J Med Genet 2003 40 e52 12746406 PMC1735457
  15. Mellen M Ayata P Dewell S Kriaucionis S Heintz N MeCP2 binds to 5hmC enriched within active genes and accessible chromatin in the nervous system Cell 2012 151 1417 30 23260135 PMC3653293
  16. Monros E Armstrong J Aibar E Poo P Canos I Pineda M Rett syndrome in Spain: mutation analysis and clinical correlations Brain Dev 2001 23 Suppl 1 S251 3 11738885
  17. Nan X Meehan RR Bird A Dissection of the methyl-CpG binding domain from the chromosomal protein MeCP2 Nucleic Acids Res 1993 21 4886 92 8177735 PMC311401
  18. Nan X Tate P Li E Bird A DNA methylation specifies chromosomal localization of MeCP2 Mol Cell Biol 1996 16 414 21 8524323 PMC231017
  19. Neul JL Kaufmann WE Glaze DG Christodoulou J Clarke AJ Bahi-Buisson N Leonard H Bailey ME Schanen NC Zappella M Renieri A Huppke P Percy AK Rett syndrome: revised diagnostic criteria and nomenclature Ann Neurol 2010 68 944 50 21154482 PMC3058521
  20. Percy AK Lane JB Childers J Skinner S Annese F Barrish J Caeg E Glaze DG MacLeod P Rett syndrome: North American database J Child Neurol 2007 22 1338 41 18174548
  21. Renieri A Mari F Mencarelli MA Scala E Ariani F Longo I Meloni I Cevenini G Pini G Hayek G Zappella M Diagnostic criteria for the Zappella variant of Rett syndrome (the preserved speech variant) Brain Dev 2009 31 208 16 18562141
  22. Schanen C Houwink EJ Dorrani N Lane J Everett R Feng A Cantor RM Percy A Phenotypic manifestations of MECP2 mutations in classical and atypical Rett syndrome Am J Med Genet A 2004 126A 129 40 15057977
  23. Tarquinio DC Motil KJ Hou W Lee HS Glaze DG Skinner SA Neul JL Annese F McNair L Barrish JO Geerts SP Lane JB Percy AK Growth failure and outcome in Rett syndrome: specific growth references Neurology 2012 79 1653 61 23035069 PMC3468773
  24. Weaving LS Williamson SL Bennetts B Davis M Ellaway CJ Leonard H Thong MK Delatycki M Thompson EM Laing N Christodoulou J Effects of MECP2 mutation type, location and X-inactivation in modulating Rett syndrome phenotype Am J Med Genet A 2003 118A 103 14 12655490
  25. Xinhua B Shengling J Fuying S Hong P Meirong L Wu XR X chromosome inactivation in Rett Syndrome and its correlations with MECP2 mutations and phenotype J Child Neurol 2008 23 22 5 18184939
  26. Zappella M The Rett girls with preserved speech Brain Dev 1992 14 98 101 1621933

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cuddapah, V. A., Pillai, R. B., Shekar, K. V., Lane, J. B., Motil, K. J., Skinner, S. A., Tarquinio, D. C., Glaze, D. G., McGwin, G., Kaufmann, W. E., Percy, A. K., Neul, J. L., & Olsen, M. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • Civitan International (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • Greenwood Genetic Center (US)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Olsen, Michelle L
Venue
Journal of Medical Genetics
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2014-01-07
Volume
51
Issue
3
Pages
152-158
ISSN
  • 0022-2593 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-6244
OpenAlex
W2099517884
Cited by
311
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 9
FWCI
16.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Civitan International
  • National Institutes of Health (HD061222, HD38985)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-38985, HD-061222, P30HD038985, U54HD061222)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Hereditary Neurological Disorders
Keywords
Rett syndrome, MECP2 mutations, disease severity, phenotypic variability, mutation types, truncating mutations, splice site mutation, nonsense mutation, frameshift deletion, insertion, age-related disease progression, ambulation, hand use, stereotypy, atypical Rett syndrome
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Mutation, Severity of Illness Index, Rett Syndrome, Methyl-CpG-Binding Protein 2, Young Adult, Genetic Association Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review