Cited by 88

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The UCL low-density lipoprotein receptor gene variant database: pathogenicity update

Leigh, Sarah, Futema, Marta, Whittall, Ros, Taylor-Beadling, Alison, Williams, Maggie, den Dunnen, Johan T, Humphries, Steve E·2017·Journal of Medical Genetics

Abstract

Background: Familial hypercholesterolaemia (OMIM 143890) is most frequently caused by variations in the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) gene. Predicting whether novel variants are pathogenic may not be straightforward, especially for missense and synonymous variants. In 2013, the Association of Clinical Genetic Scientists published guidelines for the classification of variants, with categories 1 and 2 representing clearly not or unlikely pathogenic, respectively, 3 representing variants of unknown significance (VUS), and 4 and 5 representing likely to be or clearly pathogenic, respectively. Here, we update the University College London (UCL) LDLR variant database according to these guidelines. Methods: PubMed searches and alerts were used to identify novel LDLR variants for inclusion in the database. Standard in silico tools were used to predict potential pathogenicity. Variants were designated as class 4/5 only when the predictions from the different programs were concordant and as class 3 when predictions were discordant. Results: The updated database (http://www.lovd.nl/LDLR) now includes 2925 curated variants, representing 1707 independent events. All 129 nonsense variants, 337 small frame-shifting and 117/118 large rearrangements were classified as 4 or 5. Of the 795 missense variants, 115 were in classes 1 and 2, 605 in class 4 and 75 in class 3. 111/181 intronic variants, 4/34 synonymous variants and 14/37 promoter variants were assigned to classes 4 or 5. Overall, 112 (7%) of reported variants were class 3. Conclusions: This study updates the LDLR variant database and identifies a number of reported VUS where additional family and in vitro studies will be required to confirm or refute their pathogenicity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jmedgenet-2016-104054

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The LDLR variant database identified 37 variants occurring in the promoter region.

    “The LDLR variant database (generated by Leigh et. al.), identified 37 variants occurring in the promotor region33.”
  • Approximately 3,000 variants have been identified in the human LDLR gene that could have functional consequences on LDLR expression and circulating LDL levels.

    “Thus far, ~3,000 variants have been identified in the human LDLR gene33 that could have functional consequences on LDLR expression and ultimately, circulating LDL levels.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw028 · DOI
  2. Lahtinen, 2015, Prevalence and clinical correlates of familial hypercholesterolemia founder mutations in the general population, Atherosclerosis, 238, 64, 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.11.015 · DOI
  3. 10.1093/pubmed/fdh176 · DOI
  4. 10.1093/eurheartj/eht273 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1136/bmj.a2423 · DOI
  6. 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.111.962456 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S0002-9149(98)00215-X · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S0021-9150(00)00647-X · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2008.00436.x · DOI
  10. 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2012.00724.x · DOI
  11. 10.1002/humu.20654 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/s004390100505 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/humu.21438 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/nmeth0410-248 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1038/nprot.2009.86 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1038/nmeth.2890 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1089/cmb.1997.4.311 · DOI
  18. 10.1093/nar/gkm407 · DOI
  19. Khamis, 2015, Functional analysis of four LDLR 5′UTR and promoter variants in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia, Eur J Hum Genet, 23, 790, 10.1038/ejhg.2014.199 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1038/nature15393 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.04.011 · DOI
  22. 10.1002/humu.1380010602 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Benito-Vicente, 2015, The importance of an integrated analysis of clinical, molecular, and functional data for the genetic diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia, Genet Med, 17, 980, 10.1038/gim.2015.14 · DOI
  24. 10.1194/jlr.M200470-JLR200 · DOI
  25. 10.1161/01.ATV.17.7.1392 · DOI
  26. Etxebarria, 2015, Activity-associated effect of LDL receptor missense variants located in the cysteine-rich repeats, Atherosclerosis, 238, 304, 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.12.026 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/humu.21630 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.08.017 · DOI
  29. Etxebarria, 2015, Functional characterization and classification of frequent low-density lipoprotein receptor variants, Hum Mutat, 36, 129, 10.1002/humu.22721 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1161/01.ATV.18.10.1600 · DOI
  31. 10.1136/jmg.2007.057000 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2010.07.012 · DOI
  33. Liguori, 2001, LDL receptor cDNA sequence analysis in familial hypercholesterolemia patients: 5 novel mutations with high prevalence in families originating from southern Italy, Hum Mutat, 17, 433, 10.1002/humu.1122 · DOI
  34. 10.1002/humu.21348 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Sun, 2015, Identification of the gene defect responsible for severe hypercholesterolaemia using whole-exome sequencing, Sci Rep, 5, 11380, 10.1038/srep11380 · DOI
  36. 10.1093/hmg/5.9.1325 · DOI
  37. Jensen, 1999, Normolipidemia and hypercholesterolemia in persons heterozygous for the same 1592+5GA splice site mutation in the low-density lipoprotein receptor gene, Clin Genet, 56, 379, 10.1034/j.1399-0004.1999.560506.x · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2005.02.016 · DOI
  39. 10.1038/jhg.2010.87 · DOI
  40. 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2008.00999.x · DOI
  41. 10.1177/0004563215572702 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.07.019 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90320-J · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.numecd.2015.06.007 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00371-3 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Strøm, 2014, Mutation G805R in the transmembrane domain of the LDL receptor gene causes familial hypercholesterolemia by inducing ectodomain cleavage of the LDL receptor in the endoplasmic reticulum, FEBS Open Biol, 4, 321, 10.1016/j.fob.2014.03.007 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1093/hmg/ddv304 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Leigh, S., Futema, M., Whittall, R., Taylor-Beadling, A., Williams, M., den Dunnen, J. T., & Humphries, S. E.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Cardiovascular Genetics, Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University College London, London, UK
  • NE Thames Regional Genetics Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
  • Bristol Genetics Laboratory, Pathology Sciences, Blood Sciences and Bristol Genetics, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
  • Clinical Genetics and Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
Venue
Journal of Medical Genetics
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2016-11-07
Volume
54
Issue
4
Pages
217-223
ISSN
  • 0022-2593
  • 1468-6244
Cited by
88
References
2
Language
en
Funders
British Heart Foundation (BHf RG 08/008)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review