The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The avoiding late diagnosis of ovarian cancer (ALDO) project; a pilot national surveillance programme for women with pathogenic germline variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2
Open accessAbstract
Background: Our study aimed to establish ‘real-world’ performance and cost-effectiveness of ovarian cancer (OC) surveillance in women with pathogenic germline BRCA1/2 variants who defer risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO). Methods: Our study recruited 875 female BRCA1/2-heterozygotes at 13 UK centres and via an online media campaign, with 767 undergoing at least one 4-monthly surveillance test with the Risk of Ovarian Cancer Algorithm (ROCA) test. Surveillance performance was calculated with modelling of occult cancers detected at RRSO. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated using Markov population cohort simulation. Results: Our study identified 8 OCs during 1277 women screen years: 2 occult OCs at RRSO (both stage 1a), and 6 screen-detected; 3 of 6 (50%) were ≤stage 3a and 5 of 6 (83%) were completely surgically cytoreduced. Modelled sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) for OC were 87.5% (95% CI, 47.3 to 99.7), 99.9% (99.9–100), 75% (34.9–96.8) and 99.9% (99.9–100), respectively. The predicted number of quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained by surveillance was 0.179 with an ICER cost-saving of -£102,496/QALY. Conclusion: OC surveillance for women deferring RRSO in a ‘real-world’ setting is feasible and demonstrates similar performance to research trials; it down-stages OC, leading to a high complete cytoreduction rate and is cost-saving in the UK National Health Service (NHS) setting. While RRSO remains recommended management, ROCA-based surveillance may be considered for female BRCA-heterozygotes who are deferring such surgery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the ALDO study, surveillance for women who opt to defer RRSO in a real-world setting is feasible with a sensitivity of 87.5%, specificity of 99.9%, positive predictive value of 75.0%, and negative predictive value of 99.9% for detecting ovarian cancer.
“Authors concluded that surveillance for women who opt to defer RRSO in a “real-world” setting is feasible with a sensitivity of 87.5%, specificity of 99.9%, a positive predictive value of 75.0%, and a negative predictive value of 99.9% for detecting ovarian cancer [44].”
From Screening, Risk Reduction Strategies, and Clinical Management of Unaffected Carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 Pathogenic Variants (2026) · cites this paper as [44]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- 10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70476-4 · DOI
- 10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105792 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.03.005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jama.2017.7112 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.06.070 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41416-019-0446-1 · DOI
- 10.1136/jmedgenet-2020-107356 · DOI
- 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0171 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03257.x · DOI
- 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.9330 · DOI
- 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2750 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.10.495 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.08.034 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00731-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.6905 · DOI
- 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2497 · DOI
- 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001541 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Abdel-Razeq, H., & Mansour, R. (2026) · World Journal of Oncology · doi:10.14740/wjon2692
Metadata
- Authors
- Philpott, S., Raikou, M., Manchanda, R., Lockley, M., Singh, N., Scott, M., Evans, D. G., Adlard, J., Ahmed, M., Edmondson, R., Woodward, E. R., Lamnisos, A., Balega, J., Brady, A. F., Sharma, A., Izatt, L., Kulkarni, A., Tripathi, V., Solomons, J. S., Hayes, K., Hanson, H., Snape, K., Side, L., Skates, S., McGuire, A., & Rosenthal, A. N.
- Affiliations
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- University of Piraeus (GR)
- Queen Mary University of London (GB)
- Barts Health NHS Trust (GB)
- University of Manchester (GB)
- Chapel Allerton Hospital (GB)
- Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB)
- The Eve Appeal (GB)
- Birmingham City Hospital (GB)
- London North West Healthcare NHS Trust (GB)
- University Hospital of Wales (GB)
- Guy's Hospital (GB)
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
- St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- St George's, University of London (GB)
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Rosenthal, Adam N
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Genetics
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2022-11-01
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 440-449
- ISSN
- 0022-2593 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-6244
- PMC
- PMC10176325
- OpenAlex
- W4307826988
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 2.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Medical Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
- St George's Online Research Archive (St George's University of London) (acceptedVersion)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- North Central London Cancer Alliance
- Abcodia Ltd
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Keywords
- BRCA1, BRCA2, germline pathogenic variants, delayed surgery, occult cancer detection, cost-effectiveness, quality-adjusted life years, cytoreduction, hereditary ovarian cancer
- MeSH terms
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis, Female, Germ Cells, United Kingdom, Humans, Mutation, Ovarian Neoplasms, Ovariectomy, Population Surveillance, State Medicine, BRCA1 Protein, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, BRCA2 Protein, Delayed Diagnosis, Salpingectomy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review