Constipation preceding Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review published literature to estimate the magnitude of association between premorbid constipation and later diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. BACKGROUND: Constipation is a recognised non-motor feature of Parkinson's and has been reported to predate diagnosis in a number of observational studies. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out following the Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) criteria. A literature search was undertaken in December 2014 using PubMed and the search terms 'Parkinson's disease' and 'constipation'. Articles were screened for suitability and reviewed against inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies were included if they assessed constipation by means of a structured questionnaire or if constipation/drugs used to treat constipation were coded in patient medical records. Data were extracted using a standardised template and effect size estimates combined using a fixed-effects model. Heterogeneity was explored with the I(2) statistic. RESULTS: 9 studies were included in the meta-analysis, with a combined sample size of 741 593 participants. Those with constipation had a pooled OR of 2.27 (95% CI 2.09 to 2.46) for developing subsequent Parkinson's disease compared with those without constipation. Weak evidence for heterogeneity was found (I(2)=18.9%, p=0.282). Restricting analysis to studies assessing constipation more than 10 years prior to Parkinson's disease gave a pooled OR of 2.13 (95% CI 1.78 to 2.56; I(2)=0.0%). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that people with constipation are at a higher risk of developing Parkinson's disease compared with those without and that constipation can predate Parkinson's diagnosis by over a decade.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Non-motor symptoms such as constipation and bloating are among the earliest seen in prodromal PD.
“First, non-motor symptoms such as constipation and bloating are among the earliest seen in prodromal PD [10, 11].”
From The gut–brain axis in early Parkinson’s disease: from prodrome to prevention (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 228
- Authors
- Adams-Carr, K. L., Bestwick, J. P., Shribman, S., Lees, A., Schrag, A., & Noyce, A. J.
- Affiliations
- Charing Cross Hospital (GB)
- Queen Mary University of London (GB)
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (GB)
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Noyce, Alastair J
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2015-09-07
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 710-716
- ISSN
- 0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-330X
- OpenAlex
- W2104419318
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 1.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Parkinson's UK (F1201)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Keywords
- Parkinson's disease, constipation, non-motor symptoms, risk factors, disease onset
- MeSH terms
- Constipation, Humans, Parkinson Disease, Risk, Statistics as Topic, Odds Ratio
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review