Cited by 26Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsPolyomavirus and related diseases

Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: a multicentre study to compare revised McDonald-2010 and Filippi-2010 criteria

Preziosa, Paolo, Rocca, Maria A, Mesaros, Sarlota, Meani, Alessandro, Montalban, Xavier, Drulovic, Jelena, Droby, Amgad, Zipp, Frauke +5 more·2018·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Abstract

MRI has been formally included in the diagnostic work-up of patients with a suspicion of multiple sclerosis (MS) in 2001, to demonstrate disease dissemination in space (DIS) and time (DIT) and to exclude alternative diagnoses.1 Over time, these criteria have been modified to simplify their use and to clarify specific aspects (eg, spinal cord findings).2 One aspect marginally analysed in the diagnostic work-up of patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) is the role of intracortical lesions (ICLs), which are a prominent feature of MS and contribute to disability and cognitive impairment.2 A single-centre study3 showed that inclusion of ICL for the evaluation of DIS in CIS increased the accuracy of MRI diagnostic criteria, with an improvement of specificity.3 The aim of this study was to compare revised McDonald-20101 and Filippi-20103 criteria with respect to development of clinically definite MS (CDMS) in a multicentric cohort of patients with CIS. Institutional review board approval and written informed consent were obtained. ### Subjects Consecutive patients with CIS suggestive of MS were prospectively recruited from 2008 to 2013 from five European centres within the MAGNIMS network (http://www.magnims.eu/) (see online supplementary file 1, Supplementary Methods). ### Supplementary Material Supplementary material 1[SP1.pdf] Inclusion criteria were a typical CIS syndrome, exclusion of alternative diagnoses and previous events, a baseline brain (including double inversion recovery (DIR)) and spinal cord MRI scan acquired ≤3 months from CIS onset, a follow-up brain scan acquired ≤12 months from CIS onset and a clinical follow-up ≥3 years or until CDMS conversion (defined as occurrence of a second relapse ≥1 month after the first attack) if ≤3 years. ### MRI acquisition and analysis Using 1.5 (two centres) or 3.0 Tesla (three centres) scanners, brain (including DIR) and spinal cord sequences for lesion identification were acquired. Online supplementary material shows parameters and examples of MRI sequences …

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jnnp-2017-315863

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The increasingly strong focus on timely diagnosis to alleviate uncertainty for patients and allow initiation of disease-modifying therapy (DMT) also may increase the risk of misdiagnosis.

    “The increasingly strong focus on timely diagnosis to alleviate uncertainty for patients and allow initiation of disease-modifying therapy (DMT) also may increase the risk of misdiagnosis. 12”
  • As with any diagnostic criteria, a tradeoff exists between sensitivity and specificity.

    “As with any diagnostic criteria, a tradeoff exists between sensitivity (to allow efficient diagnosis in patients having MS) and specificity (avoiding erroneous diagnosis in patients who do not have MS). 12”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Preziosa, P., Rocca, M. A., Mesaros, S., Meani, A., Montalban, X., Drulovic, J., Droby, A., Zipp, F., Calabrese, M., Sastre-Garriga, J., Dujmovic-Basuroski, I., Rovira, A., & Filippi, M.
Affiliations
  • Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT)
  • University of Belgrade (RS)
  • University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
  • University of Verona (IT)
Corresponding author
Filippi, Massimo
Venue
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2017-07-19
Volume
89
Issue
3
Pages
316-318
ISSN
  • 0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-330X
OpenAlex
W2737092979
Cited by
26
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ministarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog Razvoja
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Polyomavirus and related diseases
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, clinically isolated syndrome, intracortical lesions, MRI diagnostic criteria, conversion to multiple sclerosis, spinal cord lesions
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Cerebral Cortex, Demyelinating Diseases, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Prospective Studies, Spinal Cord, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review