Cited by 84Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesInsurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk ManagementChronic Disease Management Strategies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Excess mortality among patients with multiple sclerosis in Denmark has dropped significantly over the past six decades: a population based study

Koch-Henriksen, Nils, Laursen, Bjarne, Stenager, Egon, Magyari, Melinda·2017·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Lifetime expectancy in multiple sclerosis (MS) is reduced. Few studies have had sufficient follow-up or sufficient number of patients to assess if survival has improved with time. However, a recent meta-analysis found no time-dependent change in MS excess mortality across studies over recent decades. Objective To investigate whether short-term all-cause excess mortality in patients with MS in the total Danish population has changed over the last six decades. Patients and methods We included all patients with MS recorded in the nationwide Danish MS Registry with definite or probable MS and onset from 1950 through 1999. The Danish Civil Registration System provided date of death for all deceased patients with follow-up in 2015, and Statistics Denmark supplied specific population mortality. We calculated excess number of death per 1000 person-years (EDR) and standardised mortality ratio (SMR). Results We included 18 847 patients among whom 6102 had died as opposed to 2492 expected deaths. EDR was 10.63 (95% CI 10.19 to 11.09) and a SMR was 2.45 (95% CI 2.39 to 2.51). The 15-year EDR dropped gradually from 11.29 (95% CI 9.95 to 12.73) in the 1950-1959 onset cohort to 2.56 (95% CI 1.98 to 3.18) in the 1990-1999 onset cohort, and SMR dropped from 4.48 (95% CI 4.06 to 4.92) to 1.80 (95% CI 1.62 to 1.99). Conclusion The decline in short-term excess mortality in MS started decades before disease-modifying treatment of MS became available, before use of MRI became widespread…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jnnp-2017-315907

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Koch-Henriksen, N., Laursen, B., Stenager, E., & Magyari, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Venue
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2017-07-13
Volume
88
Issue
8
Pages
626-631
ISSN
  • 0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-330X
OpenAlex
W2737474455
Cited by
84
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4
FWCI
6.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
The danish Multiple Sclerosis Society
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, excess mortality, all-cause mortality, survival trends, standardized mortality ratio, mortality decline, disease-modifying therapy, malignant transformation, cohort change, Denmark
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cause of Death, Denmark, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Registries, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review