PO071 Mri assessment of neurovascular changes in idiopathic parkinson’s disease
Abstract
The extent to which neurovascular mechanisms are involved in Idiopathic Parkinson’s disease (IPD) is not well defined, but is important because this might open up new therapeutic approaches. We have investigated neurovascular status (NVS) in IPD using novel MRI techniques. Fifty-one patients with IPD (mean age 69.0±7.7 years) (21 tremor dominant, 24 postural instability and gait disorder and 6 intermediates) were compared with 18 control positive (CP) subjects with a history of clinical cerebrovascular disease (mean age 70.1±8.0 years) and 34 control negative (CN) subjects without a history of cerebrovascular disease (mean age 67.4±7.6 years). Each underwent a 3 T MRI protocol including arterial spin labelling measurements of cerebral blood flow (CBF) and arterial arrival time (AAT) and dynamic contrast enhanced measures of blood-brain barrier integrity. IPD subjects showed diffuse regions of significantly prolonged AAT and focal regions of lower CBF by comparison with CN, comparable to CP subjects. IPD subjects also showed increased leakiness of the blood-brain barrier in basal ganglia regions compared to the CN group, with a similar pattern between IPD phenotypes. These data provide evidence of altered NVS in IPD.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Parkinson's disease, DCE-MRI studies have demonstrated blood-brain barrier breakdown in the basal ganglia in patients compared with controls.
“recent studies have demonstrated BBB breakdown in the basal ganglia in PD patients compared with controls (10).”
From Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back (2019) · cites this paper as [10]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Blood–brain barrier breakdown in Alzheimer disease and other neurodegenerative disorders
Sweeney, M. D., Sagare, A. P., & Zlokovic, B. V. (2018) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2017.188 · Cited by 3,076 · see citing works
Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back
Sweeney, M. D., Zhao, Z., Montagne, A., Nelson, A. R., & Zlokovic, B. V. (2019) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00050.2017 · Cited by 2,294 · see citing works
The role of brain vasculature in neurodegenerative disorders
Sweeney, M. D., Kisler, K., Montagne, A., Toga, A. W., & Zlokovic, B. V. (2018) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0234-x · Cited by 998 · see citing works
- Authors
- Al-Bachari, S., Vidyasagar, R., Emsley, H., & Parkes, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Manchester (GB)
- Venue
- Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2017-12
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- Suppl 1
- Pages
- A30.3-A30
- ISSN
- 0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-330X
- OpenAlex
- W2774693087
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 0.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Keywords
- idiopathic Parkinson's disease, cerebral blood flow, arterial spin labeling, blood-brain barrier integrity, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, basal ganglia, cerebrovascular disease, tremor-dominant Parkinson's disease
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review