Cited by 6Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

PO071 Mri assessment of neurovascular changes in idiopathic parkinson’s disease

Al-Bachari, Sarah, Vidyasagar, Rishma, Emsley, Hedley, Parkes, Laura·2017·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Abstract

The extent to which neurovascular mechanisms are involved in Idiopathic Parkinson’s disease (IPD) is not well defined, but is important because this might open up new therapeutic approaches. We have investigated neurovascular status (NVS) in IPD using novel MRI techniques. Fifty-one patients with IPD (mean age 69.0±7.7 years) (21 tremor dominant, 24 postural instability and gait disorder and 6 intermediates) were compared with 18 control positive (CP) subjects with a history of clinical cerebrovascular disease (mean age 70.1±8.0 years) and 34 control negative (CN) subjects without a history of cerebrovascular disease (mean age 67.4±7.6 years). Each underwent a 3 T MRI protocol including arterial spin labelling measurements of cerebral blood flow (CBF) and arterial arrival time (AAT) and dynamic contrast enhanced measures of blood-brain barrier integrity. IPD subjects showed diffuse regions of significantly prolonged AAT and focal regions of lower CBF by comparison with CN, comparable to CP subjects. IPD subjects also showed increased leakiness of the blood-brain barrier in basal ganglia regions compared to the CN group, with a similar pattern between IPD phenotypes. These data provide evidence of altered NVS in IPD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jnnp-2017-abn.103

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Parkinson's disease, DCE-MRI studies have demonstrated blood-brain barrier breakdown in the basal ganglia in patients compared with controls.

    “recent studies have demonstrated BBB breakdown in the basal ganglia in PD patients compared with controls (10).”

    From Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back (2019) · cites this paper as [10]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Al-Bachari, S., Vidyasagar, R., Emsley, H., & Parkes, L.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Venue
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2017-12
Volume
88
Issue
Suppl 1
Pages
A30.3-A30
ISSN
  • 0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-330X
OpenAlex
W2774693087
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
idiopathic Parkinson's disease, cerebral blood flow, arterial spin labeling, blood-brain barrier integrity, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, basal ganglia, cerebrovascular disease, tremor-dominant Parkinson's disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review