Cited by 14Adrenal Hormones and DisordersPituitary Gland Disorders and TreatmentsTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

A case of post-traumatic isolated ACTH deficiency with spontaneous recovery 9 months after the event

Open access
Karavitaki, N·2006·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Abstract

Survivors of traumatic brain injury (TBI) often suffer from significant adverse physical, neuropsychological, and social sequelae. TBI may pose significant risks to pituitary function;1–5 untreated hypopituitarism may aggravate these adverse consequences. Studies on the natural history of post-TBI hypopituitarism are lacking, and the reversibility of hormone deficits remains uncertain. We describe a case of a man who suffered a transient period of secondary hypoadrenalism after a serious TBI. This is the first reported case of reversible isolated adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) deficiency following head trauma. An 18 year old man was assaulted on 14 September 2003 and immediately admitted to the local accident and emergency unit with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 3/15 and constricted pupils. Brain computed tomography (CT) revealed multiple small bleeds involving the basal ganglia, left cerebellum, and midbrain, and a left maxilla linear fracture. No other serious injuries were found. He was ventilated on admission, supported in the intensive care unit, and 4 days later transferred to a trauma ward with an unaltered brain CT. Over the next 7 weeks, his GCS remained reduced (6–11/15) with a marked improvement after this time. During his acute recovery phase, no hypotensive insults were recorded, but he had episodes of …

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jnnp.2005.070482

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other reports describe pituitary and hypothalamic dysfunction after TBI.

    “Other reports describe pituitary and hypothalamic dysfunction,17,18”

    From Loss of hypocretin (orexin) neurons with traumatic brain injury (2009) · cites this paper as [17]

    The case report describes isolated ACTH deficiency after traumatic brain injury, supporting pituitary dysfunction. The Discussion mentions the hypothalamus as a possible site of injury but does not report hypothalamic dysfunction; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Benvenga S, Campenni A, Ruggeri RM, et al. Hypopituitarism secondary to head trauma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000;85:1353-61.
  2. Agha A, Rogers B, Sherlock M, et al. Anterior pituitary dysfunction in survivors of traumatic brain injury. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004;89:4929-36.
  3. Agha A, Sherlock M, Phillips J, et al. The natural history of post-traumatic neurohypophysial dysfunction. Eur J Endocrinol 2005;152:371-7.
  4. Hodges JR. Chorea and the lupus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987;50:368-9.
  5. Hughes GRV, Khamashta M. Seronegative antiphospholipid syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 2003;62:1127.
  6. Harrison NA, Church A, Nisbet A, et al. Late recurrences of Sydenham's chorea are not associated with anti-basal ganglia antibodies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75:1478-9. Competing interests: none Patient consent: the patient gave her written informed consent. However, we have not included any identi- fying details in this case report. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2005.069534 Competing interests: none declared · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karavitaki, N.
Affiliations
Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Karavitaki, N
Venue
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2006-02-01
Volume
77
Issue
2
Pages
276-277
ISSN
0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119487293
Cited by
14
References
3
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Keywords
isolated ACTH deficiency, traumatic brain injury, hypopituitarism, spontaneous recovery, pituitary function, assault injuries, natural history (disease)
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adrenocorticotropic Hormone, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Maxillary Fractures, Pituitary Function Tests, Pituitary Gland, Remission, Spontaneous, Glasgow Coma Scale, Cerebral Hemorrhage, Traumatic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review