Clinical classification of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures based on video-EEG analysis and automatic clustering
Abstract
Background Psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) or attacks consist of paroxysmal behavioural changes that resemble an epileptic seizure but are not associated with electrophysiological epileptic changes. They are caused by a psychopathological process and are primarily diagnosed on history and video-EEG. Clinical presentation comprises a wide range of symptoms and signs, which are individually neither totally specific nor sensitive, making positive diagnosis of PNES difficult. Consequently, PNES are often misdiagnosed as epilepsy. The aim of this study was to identify homogeneous groups of PNES based on specific combinations of clinical signs with a view to improving timely diagnosis. Methods The authors first retrospectively analysed 22 clinical signs of 145 PNES recorded by video-EEG in 52 patients and then conducted a multiple correspondence analysis and hierarchical cluster analysis. Results Five clusters of signs were identified and named according to their main clinical features: dystonic attack with primitive gestural activity (31.6%); pauci-kinetic attack with preserved responsiveness (23.4%); pseudosyncope (16.9%); hyperkinetic prolonged attack with hyperventilation and auras (11.7%); axial dystonic prolonged attack (16.4%). When several attacks were recorded in the same patient, they were automatically classified in the same subtype in 61.5% of patients. Conclusion This study proposes an objective clinical classification of PNES based on automatic clustering of…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the absence of associated jerky movements, patients with apparent loss of consciousness are likely to be referred for evaluation of syncope.
“In the absence of associated jerky movements, the patient is likely to be referred for evaluation of syncope (30,229,524).”
From 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Syncope (2017) · cites this paper as [524]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 24 · Cited by 161
- Authors
- Hubsch, C., Baumann, C., Hingray, C., Gospodaru, N., Vignal, J.-P., Vespignani, H., & Maillard, L.
- Affiliations
- Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy (FR)
- Inserm (FR)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Maillard, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2011-05-10
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 955-960
- ISSN
- 0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1984115579
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 7.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
- Keywords
- psychogenic non-epileptic seizures, clinical classification, video-EEG monitoring, automatic clustering, clinical signs, misdiagnosis as epilepsy, multiple correspondence analysis, hierarchical clustering
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Diagnosis, Differential, Dystonia, Electroencephalography, Epilepsy, Female, Humans, Hyperkinesis, Male, Middle Aged, Movement, Retrospective Studies, Seizures, Socioeconomic Factors, Syncope, Cluster Analysis, Age of Onset, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review