The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impulse conduction in multiple sclerosis: a theoretical basis for modification by temperature and pharmacological agents
Open accessAbstract
The simplest model for explaining conduction defects in multiple sclerosis (MS) and other demyelinating diseases assumes that the only abnormality present is loss of myelin. The consequences of such an assumption have been investigated by numerical solution of a well-known set of differential equations describing conduction in a model demyelinated axon. In agreement with clinical findings, we show that this model predicts that the temperature at which conduction block occurs is a steep function of the extent of demyelination, so that small temperature increases may block large numbers of conducting fibres. Decreasing calcium concentration (or increasing pH) is calculated markedly to improve the conduction velocity of conducting demyelinated fibres and will, in addition, restore conduction in blocked fibres. The effects of other pharmacological agents have also been computed. The presence of a demyelinating lesion in a nerve fibre is shown greatly to impair the ability of the fibre to conduct repetitive impulses, conduction failing at much lower frequencies than in normal fibres. These calculations provide some insight into the nature of conduction defects in demyelinated nerve, demonstrate that many clinical features of MS are the expected consequence of loss of myelin and do not require the presence of other defects for their explanation, and provide a useful approach to the search for a symptomatic therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Internodal conduction in undissected demyelinated nerve fibres
Rasminsky, M., & Sears, T. A. (1972) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp010035 · Cited by 329
Cited by
Molecular dissection of the myelinated axon
Waxman, S. G., & Ritchie, J. M. (1993) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410330202 · Cited by 354
Smith, K. J., & McDonald, W. I. (1999) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1999.0510 · Cited by 340
Bostock, H., Sears, T. A., & Sherratt, R. M. (1981) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013666 · Cited by 332
Viral infections trigger multiple sclerosis relapses: a prospective seroepidemiological study
Andersen, O., Lygner, P.-E., Bergstr�m, T., Andersson, M., & Vablne, A. (1993) · Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1007/bf00867354 · Cited by 265
Long-term remyelination after optic neuritis
Brusa, A., Jones, S. J., & Plant, G. T. (2001) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/124.3.468 · Cited by 165
Metadata
- Authors
- Schauf, C. L., & Davis, F. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1974-02-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 152-161
- ISSN
- 0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2155060767
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impulse conduction in multiple sclerosis: a theoretical basis for modification by temperature and pharmacological agents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jnnp.37.2.152
- The paper
- Schauf, C. L., & Davis, F. A. (1974). Impulse conduction in multiple sclerosis: a theoretical basis for modification by temperature and pharmacological agents. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.37.2.152
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.