Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 4,139

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Family history of subarachnoid haemorrhage: supplemental value of scrutinizing all relatives.

Open access
Greebe, P, Bromberg, J E, Rinkel, G J, Algra, A, van Gijn, J·1997·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: To assess the validity of the family history obtained at the bedside of patients with recent subarachnoid haemorrhage by subsequently contacting all first and second degree relatives, with verification from medical record data. RESULTS: In a prospectively collected series of 163 patients with recent subarachnoid haemorrhage the history or cause of death could be ascertained in 1259 (98%) of the first degree relatives and in 3038 (85%) of the second degree relatives. For first degree relatives only, the sensitivity of the family history at the bedside was 0.75 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.35-0.97) and the positive predictive value was 0.55 (95% CI 0.23-0.83); for first and second degree relatives together the sensitivity was 0.58 (95% CI 0.28-0.85) and the positive predictive value was 0.64 (95% CI 0.31-0.89). CONCLUSION: The accuracy of the family history taken at the bedside is modest; a more thorough collection of data is crucial if the decision is taken to screen relatives based on the family history.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jnnp.62.3.273

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Bromberg JEC, Rinkel GJE, Algra A, et al. Subarachnoid haemorrhage in first and second degree relatives of patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage. BMJ 1995; 311:288-9. · doi:10.1136/bmj.311.7000.288
  2. Bromberg JEC, Rinkel GJE, Algra A, Limburg M, van Gijn J. Outcome in familial subarachnoid haemorrhage. Stroke 1995;26:961-3. · doi:10.1161/01.str.26.6.961
  3. Norrgard 0, Angquist KA, Fodstad H, Forsell A, Lindberg M. Intracranial aneurysms and heredity. Neurosurgery 1987;20:236-9. · doi:10.1227/00006123-198702000-00006
  4. Ronkainen A, Hernesniemi J, Ryynanen M. Familial subarachnoid haemorrhage in east Finland, 1977-90. Neurosurgery 1993;33:787-97.
  5. Schievink WI, Schaid DJ, Michels VV, Piepgras DG. Familial aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a community-based study. Jf Neurosurg 1995;83:426-9. · DOI
  6. Kee F, Tiret L, Robo JY, Nicaud V, McCrum E, Evans A, Cambien F. Reliability of reported family history of myocardial infarction. BMJ 1993;307:1528-30. · DOI
  7. Bromberg JEC, Rinkel GJE, Algra A, Greebe P, Beldman T, van Gijn J. Validation of family history in subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 1996;27:630-2. · doi:10.1161/01.str.27.4.630

Cited by

See all 4,139

Metadata

Authors
Greebe, P., Bromberg, J. E., Rinkel, G. J., Algra, A., & van Gijn, J.
Venue
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1997-03-01
Volume
62
Issue
3
Pages
273-275
ISSN
0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094943913
Cited by
4,139
References
1
FWCI
11.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.