Get into Reading as an intervention for common mental health problems: exploring catalysts for change: Figure 1
Abstract
There is increasing evidence for the efficacy of non-medical strategies to improve mental health and well-being. Get into Reading is a shared reading intervention which has demonstrable acceptability and feasibility. This paper explores potential catalysts for change resulting from Get into Reading. Two weekly reading groups ran for 12 months, in a GP surgery and a mental health drop-in centre, for people with a GP diagnosis of depression and a validated severity measure. Data collection included quantitative measures at the outset and end of the study, digital recording of sessions, observation and reflective diaries. Qualitative data were analysed thematically and critically compared with digital recordings. The evidence suggested a reduction in depressive symptoms for Get into Reading group participants. Three potential catalysts for change were identified: literary form and content, including the balance between prose and poetry; group facilitation, including social awareness and communicative skills; and group processes, including reflective and syntactic mirroring. This study has generated hypotheses about potential change processes of Get into Reading groups. Evidence of clinical efficacy was limited by small sample size, participant attrition and lack of controls. The focus on depression limited the generalisability of findings to other clinical groups or in non-clinical settings. Further research is needed, including assessment of the social and economic impact and substantial trials of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of this intervention.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reading has been proposed as a protective factor in mental health and forms the basis of a number of bibliotherapeutic and other reading-based interventions.
“Reading has been proposed as a protective factor in mental health and forms the basis of a number of ‘bibliotherapeutic’ and other reading‐based interventions (Arslan et al., 2022; Carney & Robertson, 2022; Dowrick et al., 2012).”
From A counterfactual and random intercept cross‐lagged panel analysis of the effects of reading frequency on adolescent mental health in a large longitudinal study (2026) · cites this paper as Dowrick et al., 2012
Reading could encourage healthy behaviours in young people by reducing the risk of depression.
“Indirectly, reading could also encourage healthy behaviours in young people by enhancing academic success (OECD, 2002) and reducing the risk of depression (Dowrick et al., 2012), which are in turn associated with a healthy diet (Doku et al., 2011; Gillen et al., 2012), lower cigarette, alcohol, and drug use (Stone et al., 2012), and higher physical activity (Roshanaei-moghaddam et al., 2009).”
From Reading for pleasure in childhood and adolescent healthy behaviours: Longitudinal associations using the Millennium Cohort Study (2020) · cites this paper as Dowrick et al., 2012
Cites
The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x · Cited by 44,910 · see citing works
Kirsch, I., Deacon, B. J., Huedo-Medina, T. B., Scoboria, A., Moore, T. J., & Johnson, B. T. (2008) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050045 · Cited by 2,442 · see citing works
Psychological treatment of late-life depression: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Cuijpers, P., van Straten, A., & Smit, F. (2006) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.1620 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Collaborative care for depression in UK primary care: a randomized controlled trial
Richards, D. A., Lovell, K., Gilbody, S., Gask, L., Torgerson, D., Barkham, M., Bland, M., Bower, P., Lankshear, A. J., Simpson, A., et al. (2008) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291707001365 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
The Therapeutic Use of Stories
(2006) · doi:10.4324/9780203132319 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mak, H. W., & Fancourt, D. (2020) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105889 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Murray, A., Errington, P., Yang, Y., Wright, H., Mirman, D., Obsuth, I., Booth, T., Ribeaud, D., & Eisner, M. (2026) · JCPP Advances · doi:10.1002/jcv2.70075 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dowrick, C., Billington, J., Robinson, J., Hamer, A., & Williams, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- The Reader (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Dowrick, Christopher
- Venue
- Medical Humanities
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2012-02-18
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-20
- ISSN
- 1468-215X (ISSN-L)
- 1473-4265
- OpenAlex
- W2105215147
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 64.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medical Humanities (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Art Therapy and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
- Keywords
- depression, book clubs, group facilitation, literary form, poetry and prose, social awareness, common mental disorders
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Awareness, Bibliotherapy, Communication, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Female, Group Processes, Humans, Literature, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Reading, Social Behavior, Outcome Assessment, Health Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review