Meeting up in broken word/times: Communication, temporality and pace in neuromixed writing
Abstract
The article investigates letter writing as a way to explore neurodiverse collectives, neuromixed communication and neurodiverse research collaboration. From the perspective of neurodiversity studies and translation practice/studies, the article negotiates new perspectives of inherited images of neurological selves and others, such as the non-autistic as the ‘typical’ in contrast to the ‘atypical’ autistic person. Experimenting with autistic time, allowing different sensory modalities and different approaches to time, detail and narrative, the article challenges deficit approaches to autism. Through a letter writing practice the possibilities and challenges of subjectivity, cultural translation and writing as method are examined. The article suggests that ‘counter narratives’ are important sources of knowledge as they reclaim personhood from dehumanising perspectives. By performing neuromixed conversation and dialogue with theoretical concepts, and pen paling as play as a fruitful form for responsible cross-neurotype translation, the article illuminates challenges and opportunities in neurodiverse collective writing.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is a neuroqueer temporality, analogous to queer temporality.
“Just like there is a queer temporality (Halberstam, 2005), there is a neuroqueer one (Bertilsdotter Rosqvist et al., 2023).”
From Intensity and Variable Attention: Counter Narrating ADHD, from ADHD Deficits to ADHD Difference (2023) · cites this paper as Bertilsdotter Rosqvist et al., 2023
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Intensity and Variable Attention: Counter Narrating ADHD, from ADHD Deficits to ADHD Difference
Bertilsdotter Rosqvist, H., Hultman, L., Österborg Wiklund, S., Nygren, A., Storm, P., & Sandberg, G. (2023) · The British Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcad138 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Bertilsdotter Rosqvist, H., Hjorth, E., & Nygren, A.
- Affiliations
- School of Social Sciences, Södertörn University, Huddinge, Sweden
- University of Gothenburg (SE)
- Venue
- Medical Humanities
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2023-01-11
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 407-415
- ISSN
- 1468-215X (ISSN-L)
- 1473-4265
- OpenAlex
- W4315641360
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 2.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medical Humanities (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Åbo Akademi University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Autobiographical and Biographical Writing
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Artistic and Creative Research
- Keywords
- neurodiversity, autism spectrum disorder, letter writing, temporality, deficit model of autism, counter-narratives, personhood, cultural translation, writing as method, research collaboration, play, sensory modalities
- MeSH terms
- Autistic Disorder, Humans, Writing, Personhood, Narration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review