The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Eye complaints in the office environment: precorneal tear film integrity influenced by eye blinking efficiency
Open accessAbstract
To achieve a common base for understanding work related eye complaints in the office environment, it is necessary to merge approaches from indoor air science, occupational health, and ophthalmology. Based on database searches, it is concluded that precorneal tear film (PTF) alteration leads to eye complaints that may be caused by: (1) thermal factors (low relative humidity; high room temperature); (2) demanding task content (attention decreases blinking and widens the exposed ocular surface area); and (3) individual characteristics (for example, tear film alterations, blinking anomalies, gland dysfunctions, and use of contact lenses). These factors and conditions are able to progressively increase water evaporation and faster thinning of the PTF, which causes dryness and dry spot formation on the cornea, possibly followed by corneal and conjunctiva epithelial alterations and eye complaints. Another possible cause of eye complaints is certain irritating chemical compounds, in addition to oxidation mixtures that are formed in reactions between ozone and unsaturated organic compounds (alkenes). The effect may be exacerbated by low relative humidity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wolkoff, P., Wilkins, C. K., Clausen, P. A., & Nielsen, G. D. (2006) · Indoor Air · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2005.00393.x · Cited by 348
Self-citationIndoor air pollutants in office environments: Assessment of comfort, health, and performance
Wolkoff, P. (2013) · International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health · doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2012.08.001 · Cited by 342
Self-citationOcular surface wetness is regulated by TRPM8-dependent cold thermoreceptors of the cornea
Parra, A., Madrid, R., Echevarria, D., del Olmo, S., Morenilla-Palao, C., Acosta, M. C., Gallar, J., Dhaka, A., Viana, F., & Belmonte, C. (2010) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.2264 · Cited by 324
Formaldehyde and chemosensory irritation in humans: A controlled human exposure study
Lang, I., Bruckner, T., & Triebig, G. (2008) · Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2007.08.012 · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- Wolkoff, P., Nøjgaard, J. K., Troiano, P., & Piccoli, B.
- Venue
- Occupational and Environmental Medicine
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2004-12-21
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4-12
- ISSN
- 0007-1072 (ISSN-L)
- 1351-0711
- 1470-7926
- OpenAlex
- W2101741974
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Eye complaints in the office environment: precorneal tear film integrity influenced by eye blinking efficiency. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/oem.2004.016030
- The paper
- Wolkoff, P., Nøjgaard, J. K., Troiano, P., & Piccoli, B. (2005). Eye complaints in the office environment: precorneal tear film integrity influenced by eye blinking efficiency. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2004.016030
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.