The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prevalence rates and odds ratios of shoulder-neck diseases in different occupational groups.
Open accessAbstract
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association and impact of occupational exposure and diseases of the shoulder and neck. Prevalence rates, odds ratios, aetiological fractions, and their confidence intervals were computed for pooled and non-pooled data of previous published reports. By comparison with office workers and farmers, dentists had an increased odds ratio for cervical spondylosis (two studies) and for shoulder joint osteoarthrosis. Meat carriers, miners, and "heavy workers" also had significantly higher rates of cervical spondylosis compared with referents. Compared with iron foundry workers, civil servants had a significant odds ratio (4.8) of cervical disc disease and a 0.79 aetiological fraction. Whether this was due to exposure or healthy worker effect was not clear. In four occupational groups with high shoulder-neck load an odds ratio of 4.0 was found for thoracic outlet syndrome with an aetiological fraction of 0.75. Rotator cuff tendinitis in occupational groups with work at shoulder level (two studies) showed an odds ratio of 11 and an aetiological fraction of 0.91. Keyboard operators had an odds ratio of 3.0 for tension neck syndrome (five studies). Unfortunately, owing to the scanty description of the work task, the exposure could be analysed only by job title. Examination of published reports shows clearly that certain job titles are associated with shoulder-neck disorders. High rates and aetiological fractions for rotator cuff tendinitis and tension neck syndrome suggest that preventive measures could be effective. Although job descriptions are brief, the associations noted suggest that highly repetitive shoulder muscle contractions, static contractions, and work at shoulder level are hazardous exposure factors. In reports of cross sectional studies of occupational shoulder-neck disorders presentation of age, exposure, and effect distribution may help for future meta-analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471445428 · Cited by 18,646
Cited by
Physical risk factors for neck pain
Ariëns, G. A., van Mechelen, W., Bongers, P. M., Bouter, L. M., & van der Wal, G. (2000) · Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health · doi:10.5271/sjweh.504 · Cited by 525
van Rijn, R. M., Huisstede, B. M., Koes, B. W., & Burdorf, A. (2010) · Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health · doi:10.5271/sjweh.2895 · Cited by 428
Pattern of muscle activity during stereotyped work and its relation to muscle pain
Veiersted, K. B., Westgaard, R. H., & Andersen, P. (1990) · International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health · doi:10.1007/bf00397846 · Cited by 289
Musculoskeletal disorders in farmers and farm workers
Walker-Bone, K. (2002) · Occupational Medicine · doi:10.1093/occmed/52.8.441 · Cited by 280
Women with fibromyalgia: Work and rehabilitation
Henriksson, C., Liedberg, G., & Gerdle, B. (2005) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638280400009089 · Cited by 175
Metadata
- Authors
- Hagberg, M., & Wegman, D. H.
- Venue
- Occupational and Environmental Medicine
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1987-09-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 602-610
- ISSN
- 0007-1072 (ISSN-L)
- 1351-0711
- OpenAlex
- W2170106311
- Cited by
- 548
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence rates and odds ratios of shoulder-neck diseases in different occupational groups. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/oem.44.9.602
- The paper
- Hagberg, M., & Wegman, D. H. (1987). Prevalence rates and odds ratios of shoulder-neck diseases in different occupational groups. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.44.9.602
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.