The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mortality in miners and millers of crocidolite in Western Australia.
Open accessAbstract
It is known that 6505 men and 411 women were employed in the mining and milling of crocidolite at Wittenoom in the Pilbara region of Western Australia between 1943 and 1966. Employment was usually brief (median duration four months) and exposure intense (median estimated cumulative exposure 6 fibres/cc years). The vital status of 73% of the men and 58% of the women employed in the industry was known at 31 December 1980, providing 95 264 person-years of follow up with 820 deaths in men and 4914 person-years with 23 deaths in women. The standardised mortality ratio (SMR) for all causes in men was 1.53 (95% confidence interval 1.43 to 1.64). Statistically significant excess death rates were observed in men for neoplasms, particularly malignant mesothelioma (32 deaths), neoplasms of the trachea, bronchus, and lung (SMR 2.64), and neoplasms of the stomach (SMR 1.90); respiratory diseases, particularly pneumoconiosis (SMR 25.5); infections, particularly tuberculosis (SMR 4.09); mental disorders particularly alcoholism (SMR 4.87); digestive diseases, particularly peptic ulceration (SMR 2.46) and cirrhosis of the liver (SMR 3.94); and injuries and poisonings, particularly non-transport accidents (SMR 2.36). The excess mortality from pneumoconiosis, malignant mesothelioma, and respiratory cancers, but not stomach neoplasms, was dependent on time since first exposure and cumulative exposure. There was no increase in mortality from laryngeal cancer (SMR 1.09) or neoplasms other than those listed. The SMR for all causes in women was 1.47 (95% confidence interval 0.98-2.21) and for neoplasms 1.99; there was one death from malignant pleural mesothelioma.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Update of potency factors for asbestos-related lung cancer and mesothelioma
Berman, D. W., & Crump, K. S. (2008) · Critical Reviews in Toxicology · doi:10.1080/10408440802276167 · Cited by 188
Case, B. W., Abraham, J. L., Meeker, G., Pooley, F. D., & Pinkerton, K. E. (2011) · Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B · doi:10.1080/10937404.2011.556045 · Cited by 123
Reid, A., Heyworth, J., de Klerk, N., & Musk, A. W. (2008) · Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1136/oem.2007.035782 · Cited by 69
Self-citationReid, A., Heyworth, J., de Klerk, N. H., & Musk, B. (2008) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.23331 · Cited by 53
Self-citationde Klerk, N., Alfonso, H., Olsen, N., Reid, A., Sleith, J., Palmer, L., Berry, G., & Musk, A. (. (2013) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.27758 · Cited by 45
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Armstrong, B. K., de Klerk, N. H., Musk, A. W., & Hobbs, M. S.
- Venue
- Occupational and Environmental Medicine
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1988-01-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-13
- ISSN
- 0007-1072 (ISSN-L)
- 1351-0711
- OpenAlex
- W2032453281
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mortality in miners and millers of crocidolite in Western Australia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/oem.45.1.5
- The paper
- Armstrong, B. K., de Klerk, N. H., Musk, A. W., & Hobbs, M. S. (1988). Mortality in miners and millers of crocidolite in Western Australia. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.45.1.5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.