The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dust exposure and mortality in chrysotile mining, 1910-75. 1980.
Open accessAbstract
We report a further follow-up of a birth cohort of I11 379 workers exposed to chrysotile.The cohort consisted of all 10 939 men and 440 women, born 1891-1920, who had worked for at least a month in the mines and mills of Asbestos and Thetford Mines in Quebec.For all subjects, length of service and estimates of accumulated dust exposure were obtained, with a smoking history for the vast majority.Three methods of analysis, two based on the "man-years" method, the other a "case-and-multiple-controls" approach, gave results consistent with one another and with previous analyses.By the end of 1975, 4463 men and 84 women had died.Among men, the overall excess mortality, 1926-75, was 2% at Asbestos and 10% at Thetford Mines, much the dustier region.The women, mostly employed at Asbestos, had a standardised mortaiity ratio (SMR) (all causes, 1936-75) of 0 90.Analysis of deaths 20 years or more after first employment showed that in men with short service (less than five years) there was no discernible correlation with dust exposure.Among men employed at least 20 years, there were clear excesses in those exposed to the heaviest dust con- centrations.Reanalysis in terms of exposure to age 45 showed definite and consistent trends for SMRs for total mortality, for lung cancer, and for pneumoconiosis to be higher the heavier the exposure.The response to increasing dose was effectivelv linear for lung cancer and for pneumo- coniosis.Lung cancer deaths occurred in non-smokers, and showed a greater increase of incidence with increasing exposure than did lung cancer in smokers, but there was insufficient evidence to distinguish between multiplicative and additive risk models.There were no excess deaths from laryngeal cancer, but a clear association with smoking.Ten men and one woman died from pleural mesothelioma.If the only subjects studied had been the 1904 men with at least 20 years' employment in the lower dust concentrations, averaging 6-6 million particles per cubic foot (or about 20 fibres/cc), excess mortality would not have been considered statistically significant, except for pneumoconiosis.The inability of such a large epidemiological survey to detect increased risk at what, today, are considered unacceptable dust concentrations, and the consequent importance of exposure-response models are therefore emphasised.Mining, milling, and processing of the asbestos Thetford in 1878 and four years later some 60 miles group of fibrous minerals, long known for their away near Danville.Within 30 years the region was remarkable strength and fire resistance, began on a producing most of the world's asbestos.The pro- commercial scale at the end of the nineteenth portion fell as Russian, South African, and Italian century.In the Eastern Townships region of Quebec mines came into operation, but Quebec still produces deposits of chrysotile were noted in the 1847 about 25% of the world's supply, now estimated at Canadian Geological Survey.Exploitation began at about six million tons a year; indeed, production in Quebec and elsewhere has continued to expand.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Update of potency factors for asbestos-related lung cancer and mesothelioma
Berman, D. W., & Crump, K. S. (2008) · Critical Reviews in Toxicology · doi:10.1080/10408440802276167 · Cited by 188
Case, B. W., Abraham, J. L., Meeker, G., Pooley, F. D., & Pinkerton, K. E. (2011) · Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B · doi:10.1080/10937404.2011.556045 · Cited by 123
The health impact of nonoccupational exposure to asbestos: what do we know?
Goldberg, M., & Luce, D. (2009) · European Journal of Cancer Prevention · doi:10.1097/cej.0b013e32832f9bee · Cited by 85
Stayner, L., Kuempel, E., Gilbert, S., Hein, M., & Dement, J. (2008) · Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1136/oem.2007.035584 · Cited by 81
An Evaluation of Reported No-Effect Chrysotile Asbestos Exposures for Lung Cancer and Mesothelioma
Pierce, J. S., McKinley, M. A., Paustenbach, D. J., & Finley, B. L. (2008) · Critical Reviews in Toxicology · doi:10.1080/10408440701845609 · Cited by 61
Lash, T. L., Crouch, E. A., & Green, L. C. (1997) · Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1136/oem.54.4.254 · Cited by 34
Guidelines on asbestos-related pleuropulmonary disease
Isidro Montes, I., Abu Shams, K., Alday, E., Carretero Sastre, J. L., Ferrer Sancho, J., Freixa Blanxart, A., Monsó Molas, E., Pascal Martínez, I., Rodríguez Becerra, E., & Rodríguez Panadero, F. (2005) · Archivos de Bronconeumología ((English Edition)) · doi:10.1016/s1579-2129(06)60416-3 · Cited by 20
Carcinogenicity of Chrysotile Asbestos: Evidence from Cohort Studies
DEMENT, J. M. (1991) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1991.tb24440.x · Cited by 11
Interpretation of Airborne Asbestos Measurements
Chesson, J., Rench, J. D., Schultz, B. D., & Milne, K. L. (1990) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1990.tb00527.x · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- McDonald, J. C., Liddell, F. D., Gibbs, G. W., Eyssen, G. E., & McDonald, A. D.
- Venue
- Occupational and Environmental Medicine
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1993-12-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1058-1072
- ISSN
- 0007-1072 (ISSN-L)
- 1351-0711
- OpenAlex
- W4231914444
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.