Estimation of individual dermal and respiratory uptake of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in 12 coke oven workers.
Open accessAbstract
Twelve workers from a coke plant in The Netherlands participated in an intensive skin monitoring programme combined with personal air sampling and biological monitoring during five consecutive eight hour workshifts. The purpose of the study was to make a quantitative assessment of both the dermal and respiratory intake of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Pyrene was used as a marker compound for both dermal and respiratory exposure to PAHs. The biological measure for the internal exposure to PAHs was urinary 1-OH-pyrene concentration. Measurements on exposure pads at six skin sites showed that mean total skin contamination of the 12 workers ranged between 21 and 166 micrograms pyrene a day. The dermal uptake of pyrene ranged between 4 and 34 micrograms/day, which was about 20% of the pyrene contamination on skin. The mean concentration of total pyrene in the breathing zone air of the 12 coke oven workers ranged from 0.1 to 5.4 micrograms/m3. The mean respiratory uptake of pyrene varied between 0.5 and 32.2 micrograms/day. Based on the estimates of the dermal and respiratory pyrene uptake it is concluded that an average 75% (range 28%-95%, n = 12) of the total absorbed amount of pyrene enters the body through the skin. Because of the difference in the pyrene:benzo(a)pyrene ratio between the air samples and the skin contamination samples, the dermal uptake of benzo(a)pyrene was also estimated. This was about 51% of the total absorbed amount (range 8%-92%, n = 12). The total excreted amount of urinary 1-OH-pyrene as a result of exposure to PAHs during the five consecutive workshifts varied between 36 and 239 nmol. A multiple regression model of the mass balance between pyrene dose (both dermal and respiratory) and 1-OH-pyrene excretion confirmed the relevance of the dermal exposure route. The variation in urinary 1-OH-pyrene excretion was determined more by the dermal pyrene dose than by the respiratory dose. The model showed an estimate of the percentage of the absorbed amount of pyrene that is metabolised and excreted as 1-OH-pyrene in urine. For the 12 workers this percentage varied between 13% and 49% depending on smoking habits and consumption of alcohol. The results of this study indicate that among coke oven workers, the skin is the main route of uptake of PAHs. Preventive measures to reduce exposure to PAHs should be focused more on the reduction of dermal contamination by PAHs than on the reduction of inhaled dose.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dermal uptake is a direct route of pollutant contamination.
“These studies all indicate that dermal uptake is a direct route of pollutant contamination (Fig. 1).”
From The impact of airborne pollution on skin (2019) · cites this paper as [18]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The impact of airborne pollution on skin
Araviiskaia, E., Berardesca, E., Bieber, T., Gontijo, G., Sanchez Viera, M., Marrot, L., Chuberre, B., & Dreno, B. (2019) · Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · doi:10.1111/jdv.15583 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Dermal Exposure and Urinary 1-Hydroxypyrene among Asphalt Roofing Workers
McClean, M. D., Rinehart, R. D., Sapkota, A., Cavallari, J. M., & Herrick, R. F. (2007) · Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene · doi:10.1080/15459620701334756 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Dermal exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in asphalt workers
Fustinoni, S., Campo, L., Cirla, P. E., Martinotti, I., Buratti, M., Longhi, O., Foà, V., & Bertazzi, P. (2010) · Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1136/oem.2009.050344 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
- Authors
- VanRooij, J. G., Bodelier-Bade, M. M., & Jongeneelen, F. J.
- Affiliations
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- Venue
- Occupational and Environmental Medicine
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1993-07-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 623-632
- ISSN
- 0007-1072 (ISSN-L)
- 1351-0711
- PMC
- PMC1035498
- OpenAlex
- W1989577815
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 9.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Occupational and Environmental Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Fakultet Medicinskih Nauka, Univerziteta U Kragujevcu
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
- Keywords
- polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, coke oven workers, percutaneous absorption, pyrene, urinary 1-hydroxypyrene, skin contamination, exposure assessment, benzo[a]pyrene, mass balance model, occupational exposure, alcohol and tobacco use, personal air sampling
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Air, Environmental Monitoring, Humans, Industry, Middle Aged, Polycyclic Compounds, Skin, Skin Absorption, Occupational Exposure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review