The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Manual handling activities and risk of low back pain in nurses.
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE--To investigate the risk factors for low back pain in hospital nurses, with particular emphasis on the role of specific nursing activities. METHODS--A cross sectional survey of 2405 nurses employed by a group of teaching hospitals was carried out. Self administered questionnaires were used to collect information about occupational activities, non-occupational risk factors for back symptoms, and history of low back pain. RESULTS--The overall response rate was 69%. Among 1616 women, the lifetime prevalence of back pain was 60% and the one year period prevalence 45%. 10% had been absent from work because of back pain for a cumulative period exceeding four weeks. Rates in men were generally similar to those in women. In women back pain during the previous 12 months was weakly associated with height, and was significantly more common in those who reported frequent non-musculoskeletal symptoms such as headache and low mood. After adjustment for height and non-musculoskeletal symptoms, significant associations were found with frequency of manually moving patients around on the bed, manually transferring patients between bed and chair, and manually lifting patients from the floor. In contrast, no clear increase in risk was found in relation to transfer of patients with canvas and poles, manually lifting patients in and out of the bath, or lifting patients with mechanical aids. Confirmation of these findings is now being sought in a prospective study of the same population. CONCLUSIONS--This study confirms that low back pain is highly prevalent among nurses and is associated with a high level of sickness absence. People who often report non-musculoskeletal symptoms were significantly more likely to report low back pain. Specific manual handling tasks were associated with an increased risk of back pain; however, no such association was found with mechanised patient transfers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Davis, K. G., & Kotowski, S. E. (2015) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720815581933 · Cited by 382
Tinubu, B. M., Mbada, C. E., Oyeyemi, A. L., & Fabunmi, A. A. (2010) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/1471-2474-11-12 · Cited by 377
Buxton, O. M., Hopcia, K., Sembajwe, G., Porter, J. H., Dennerlein, J. T., Kenwood, C., Stoddard, A. M., Hashimoto, D., & Sorensen, G. (2012) · Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1097/jom.0b013e31824e6913 · Cited by 66
Jakobsen, M. D., Sundstrup, E., Brandt, M., & Andersen, L. L. (2018) · Musculoskeletal Science and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.msksp.2018.01.006 · Cited by 47
Jensen, J. N., Albertsen, K., Borg, V., & Nabe-Nielsen, K. (2009) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/1471-2474-10-117 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Smedley, J., Egger, P., Cooper, C., & Coggon, D.
- Venue
- Occupational and Environmental Medicine
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1995-03
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 160-163
- ISSN
- 0007-1072 (ISSN-L)
- 1351-0711
- 1470-7926
- OpenAlex
- W2011953999
- Cited by
- 446
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Manual handling activities and risk of low back pain in nurses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/oem.52.3.160
- The paper
- Smedley, J., Egger, P., Cooper, C., & Coggon, D. (1995). Manual handling activities and risk of low back pain in nurses. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.52.3.160
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.