Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 499

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ultrafine particles

Open access
Donaldson, K, Stone, V, Clouter, A, Renwick, L, MacNee, W·2001·Occupational and Environmental Medicine

Abstract

here is a long history of disease caused by inhaled particles that stretches from Agricola and Paracelsus in the 14th century up to the present. 1 In this century the twin scourges of asbestos and crystalline silica (quartz) have exerted a terrible toll of death and disease.The bad old days when these dust related lung diseases were unbridled are gone but as we enter the 21st century a new particle type-the ultrafine particle-has emerged as one with a potential role in causing disease.Ultrafine particles have been the subject of several recent reviews. 2 3 0 c ULTRAFINE PARTICLESParticles that are less than 100 nm in diameter are commonly defined as ultrafine.However, all particle populations that are found in the air are polydispersed-that is, they comprise particles with ranges of diameters that are usually summarised as mean or median diameter.There is no reason at the moment to think that there is much diVerence between a 90 nm and a 110 nm particle in ability to have an adverse eVect and there is little evidence for the cut oV point for the ultrafine eVect.Ultrafine particles are very small compared with the cellular structures and so this may be important in the apparent problems they present to the lung (fig 1).Particles of diesel exhaust may be taken as an example of an ultrafine particle, albeit complex.They are largely insoluble because of the particulate carbon core, commonly the size of singlet diesel particles, 10-20 nm.However, they tend to group into aggregates with sulphates, metals, and hydrocarbons.4 Particles of diesel soot are ubiquitous in urban air and contribute to particulate air pollution of aerodynamic diameter 10 µm (PM 10 ).However, ultrafine particles in urban air could come from a range of sources other than diesel soot.For experimental purposes toxicologists have used several standard ultrafine particles such as titanium dioxide and carbon black for their studies.5

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/oem.58.3.211

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Cited by

See all 499

Metadata

Authors
Donaldson, K., Stone, V, Clouter, A., Renwick, L., & MacNee, W.
Venue
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2001-03-01
Volume
58
Issue
3
Pages
211-216
ISSN
  • 0007-1072 (ISSN-L)
  • 1351-0711
  • 1470-7926
OpenAlex
W4248285292
Cited by
499
References
12
FWCI
9.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ultrafine particles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/oem.58.3.211
The paper
Donaldson, K., Stone, V, Clouter, A., Renwick, L., & MacNee, W. (2001). Ultrafine particles. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.58.3.211

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.