Cited by 39

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Increased lung cancer mortality among chrysotile asbestos textile workers is more strongly associated with exposure to long thin fibres

Loomis, Dana, Dement, John M, Elliott, Leslie, Richardson, David, Kuempel, Eileen D, Stayner, Leslie·2012·Occupational and Environmental Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Animal data and physical models suggest that the carcinogenicity of asbestos fibres is related to their size and shape. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the influence of fibre length and diameter on lung cancer risk in workers at asbestos textile mills in North Carolina and South Carolina, USA. METHODS: Men and women (n=6136) who worked ≥30 days in production and were employed between 1940 and 1973 were enumerated and followed for vital status through 2003. A matrix of fibre size-specific exposure estimates was constructed using determinations of fibre numbers and dimensions through analysis of 160 historical dust samples by transmission electron microscopy. Associations of lung cancer mortality with metrics of fibre exposure were estimated by Poisson regression with adjustment for age, sex, race and calendar year. RESULTS: Exposure to fibres throughout the range of length and diameter was significantly associated with increased risk of lung cancer. Models for fibres >5 μm long and <0.25 μm in diameter provided the best fit to the data, while fibres 5-10 μm long and <0.25 μm in diameter were associated most strongly with lung cancer mortality (log rate about 4% per IQR, p<0.001). When indicators of mean fibre length and diameter were modelled simultaneously, lung cancer risk increased as fibre length increased and diameter decreased. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the hypothesis that the occurrence of lung cancer is associated most strongly with exposure to long thin…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/oemed-2012-100676

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 39

Metadata

Authors
Loomis, D., Dement, J. M., Elliott, L., Richardson, D., Kuempel, E. D., & Stayner, L.
Venue
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2012-05-12
Volume
69
Issue
8
Pages
564-568
ISSN
  • 1351-0711
  • 1470-7926
Cited by
39
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Increased lung cancer mortality among chrysotile asbestos textile workers is more strongly associated with exposure to long thin fibres. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/oemed-2012-100676
The paper
Loomis, D., Dement, J. M., Elliott, L., Richardson, D., Kuempel, E. D., & Stayner, L. (2012). Increased lung cancer mortality among chrysotile asbestos textile workers is more strongly associated with exposure to long thin fibres. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2012-100676