The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Therapist-Patient Expectancies in Psychotherapy
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance.
Bordin, E. S. (1979) · Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice · doi:10.1037/h0085885 · Cited by 5,238
Problem solving and behavior modification.
D'Zurilla, T. J., & Goldfried, M. R. (1971) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0031360 · Cited by 2,257
A phase model of psychotherapy outcome: Causal mediation of change.
Howard, K. I., Lueger, R. J., Maling, M. S., & Martinovich, Z. (1993) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.61.4.678 · Cited by 576
Are patient expectations still relevant for psychotherapy process and outcome
Greenberg, R. P., Constantino, M. J., & Bruce, N. (2006) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2005.03.002 · Cited by 477
Health Behavior, Illness Behavior, and Sick-Role Behavior: II. Sick-Role Behavior
Kasl, S. V., & Cobb, S. (1966) · Archives of Environmental Health: An International Journal · doi:10.1080/00039896.1966.10664421 · Cited by 444
Metadata
- Venue
- Postgraduate Medical Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1963-11-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 457
- Pages
- 671-672
- ISSN
- 0032-5473 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-0756
- OpenAlex
- W610450293
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Therapist-Patient Expectancies in Psychotherapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/pgmj.39.457.671-c
- The paper
- Therapist-Patient Expectancies in Psychotherapy. (1963). Postgraduate Medical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.39.457.671-c
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
