The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The start of life: a history of obstetrics
Open accessAbstract
Obstetric intervention originally consisted of extraction of the baby, usually by the breech, to save the mother’s life in obstructed labour. Forceps, introduced in the 17th century, were later refined by men-midwives like William Smellie. In Victorian times, Simpson championed chloroform anaesthesia, Lister pioneered antisepsis, and caesarean section was introduced. In 1935, however, Britain’s maternal mortality rate was still around 400/100 000. It fell dramatically after antibiotics appeared and is now 11.4. In the 1960s ultrasound and electronic fetal monitoring became widely used. In 2000 the British caesarean section rate reached 20%. Worldwide, childbirth still causes 600 000 maternal deaths a year.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Loudon, I. (2000) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198204992.001.0001 · Cited by 471
(2001) · ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) · Cited by 434
Death in Childbirth: An International Study of Maternal Care and Maternal Mortality 1800-1950.
Condran, G. A., & Loudon, I. (1994) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/2168410 · Cited by 272
Looking Back on the Millennium in Medicine
(2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200001063420108 · Cited by 117
Loudon, I. (1992) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198229971.001.0001 · Cited by 102
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Lawrence, 1996, Aurelia, Cecily and Ann: a brief survey of caesarean section, The Diplomate, 3, 71
- O’Dowd, 1994, The history of obstetrics and gynaecology
- Speert, 1996, Obstetric and gynecologic milestones
- Hibbard, 1994, Pioneers in obstetrics and gynaecology 3: Peter Chamberlen, The Diplomate, 1, 309
- Studd, 1994, Pioneers in obstetrics and gynaecology 1: William Smellie, The Diplomate, 1, 153
- 1870, Obituary: Sir James Young Simpson, Lancet, i, 715
- 1912, Lancet, i, 465
- Baskett, 1997, Pioneers in obstetrics and gynaecology 6: James Young Simpson, The Diplomate, 4, 72
- Baskett, 1996, On the shoulders of giants: eponyms and names in obstetrics and gynaecology
- Eustace, 1999, The origins and development of the ventouse, The Diplomate, 5, 260
- Baird, 1965, BMJ, ii, 1141, 10.1136/bmj.2.5471.1141 · doi:10.1136/bmj.2.5471.1141
- 1986, BMJ, 293, 1446, 10.1136/bmj.293.6559.1446 · doi:10.1136/bmj.293.6559.1446
- Lewis, 2001, The confidential enquiries into maternal deaths
- 1987, BMJ, 295, 126, 10.1136/bmj.295.6590.126 · doi:10.1136/bmj.295.6590.126
Cited by
Occupational Licensing and Maternal Health: Evidence from Early Midwifery Laws
Anderson, D. M., Brown, R., Charles, K. K., & Rees, D. I. (2020) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/710555 · Cited by 98
“In the mid-1800s, the field of obstetrics was in its infancy and the vast majority of births in the United States were attended by midwives without formal training (Leavitt 1983; Drife 2002).”
Anderson, D. M., Brown, R., Charles, K. K., & Rees, D. (2016) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w22456 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Drife, J.
- Venue
- Postgraduate Medical Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-05-01
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 919
- Pages
- 311-315
- ISSN
- 0032-5473 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-0756
- OpenAlex
- W2098090623
- Cited by
- 448
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 21.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The start of life: a history of obstetrics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/pmj.78.919.311
- The paper
- Drife, J. (2002). The start of life: a history of obstetrics. Postgraduate Medical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1136/pmj.78.919.311
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
