Cited by 195Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsHeart Failure Treatment and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An overview of GLP-1 agonists and recent cardiovascular outcomes trials

Open access
Sheahan, Kelsey H, Wahlberg, Elizabeth A, Gilbert, Matthew P·2020·Postgraduate Medical Journal

Abstract

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are emerging as an important therapy to consider for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) given this class of treatment's ability to reduce glycated haemoglobin and their associated weight loss and low risk for hypoglycaemia. Additionally, seven cardiovascular outcomes trials (CVOTs) have been performed in the past 4 years using lixisenatide, liraglutide, semaglutide, exenatide, albiglutide, dulaglutide and oral semaglutide. All have found non-inferiority for cardiovascular outcomes, with many finding superiority of these drugs. These findings have transformed our guidelines on pharmacological treatment of T2D. This review article will discuss GLP-1 RA therapy, review the seven CVOTs reported to date and discuss the implications on current guidelines and therapies going forward.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/postgradmedj-2019-137186

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Food and Drug Administration, 2008, Diabetes mellitus-evaluating cardiovascular risk in new antidiabetic therapies to treat type 2 diabetes

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 195

Metadata

Authors
Sheahan, K. H., Wahlberg, E. A., & Gilbert, M. P.
Affiliations
University of Vermont Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Sheahan, Kelsey H
Venue
Postgraduate Medical Journal
Published
2019-12-04
Volume
96
Issue
1133
Pages
156-161
ISSN
  • 0032-5473 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-0756
OpenAlex
W2992144798
Cited by
194
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 8
FWCI
19.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Postgraduate Medical Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Sanofi
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  • Novo Nordisk
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Keywords
GLP-1 receptor agonists, type 2 diabetes, lixisenatide, liraglutide, semaglutide, exenatide, albiglutide, dulaglutide, oral semaglutide, HbA1c, weight loss, hypoglycemia, treatment guidelines
MeSH terms
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor, Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists, Cardiovascular Diseases, Clinical Trials as Topic, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Medication Therapy Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review