The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adverse drug event trigger tool: a practical methodology for measuring medication related harm
Open accessAbstract
Adverse drug events continue to be the single most frequent source of healthcare mishaps, continually placing patients at risk of injury. This is not unexpected, given that drug treatment is the most common medical intervention and medication use is a highly complex, multidisciplinary, and largely manual process. Assessing the actual safety of drug use has been historically difficult, mainly because traditional methods such as chart audits and voluntary reporting of data have been shown to be expensive, insensitive, and largely ineffective for detecting mistakes in drug administration and drug related adverse clinical events (ADEs). Computerized methods for detecting ADEs, employing sentinel words or "triggers" in a patient's medical record, are effective but expensive and require customized software linkage to pharmacy databases. This paper describes the use of the "trigger tool", a relatively low cost and "low tech" modification of the automated technique. The adapted technique appears to increase the rate of ADE detection approximately 50-fold over traditional reporting methodologies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Incidence of Adverse Drug Events and Potential Adverse Drug Events: Implications for Prevention
Bates, D. W. (1995) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03530010043033 · Cited by 2,127
Relationship between medication errors and adverse drug events
Bates, D. W., Boyle, D. L., Vliet, M. B. V., Schneider, J., & Leape, L. (1995) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/bf02600255 · Cited by 981
Cited by
Five Years After To Err Is Human: What Have We Learned?
Leape, L. L., & Berwick, D. M. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.293.19.2384 · Cited by 1,250
Classen, D. C., Resar, R., Griffin, F., Federico, F., Frankel, T., Kimmel, N., Whittington, J. C., Frankel, A., Seger, A., & James, B. C. (2011) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0190 · Cited by 1,027
SBAR: A Shared Mental Model for Improving Communication Between Clinicians
Haig, K. M., Sutton, S., & Whittington, J. (2006) · The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety · doi:10.1016/s1553-7250(06)32022-3 · Cited by 744
Donovan, J., Little, P., Mills, N., Smith, M., Brindle, L., Jacoby, A., Peters, T., Frankel, S., Neal, D., & Hamdy, F. (2002) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7367.766 · Cited by 533
Methodology and rationale for the measurement of harm with trigger tools
Resar, R. K. (2003) · Quality and Safety in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qhc.12.suppl_2.ii39 · Cited by 311
Metadata
- Authors
- Rozich, J. D.
- Venue
- Quality and Safety in Health Care
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2003-06-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- >3
- Pages
- 194-200
- ISSN
- 1475-3898 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-3901
- OpenAlex
- W2167601673
- Cited by
- 439
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adverse drug event trigger tool: a practical methodology for measuring medication related harm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/qhc.12.3.194
- The paper
- Rozich, J. D. (2003). Adverse drug event trigger tool: a practical methodology for measuring medication related harm. Quality and Safety in Health Care. https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.12.3.194
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.