The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Do house officers learn from their mistakes?
Open accessAbstract
Mistakes are inevitable in medicine. To learn how medical mistakes relate to subsequent changes in practice, we surveyed 254 internal medicine house officers. One hundred and fourteen house officers (45%) completed an anonymous questionnaire describing their most significant mistake and their response to it. Mistakes included errors in diagnosis (33%), prescribing (29%), evaluation (21%), and communication (5%) and procedural complications (11%). Patients had serious adverse outcomes in 90% of the cases, including death in 31% of cases. Only 54% of house officers discussed the mistake with their attending physicians, and only 24% told the patients or families. House officers who accepted responsibility for the mistake and discussed it were more likely to report constructive changes in practice. Residents were less likely to make constructive changes if they attributed the mistake to job overload. They were more likely to report defensive changes if they felt the institution was judgmental. Decreasing the work load and closer supervision may help prevent mistakes. To promote learning, faculty should encourage house officers to accept responsibility and to discuss their mistakes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
West, C. P., Huschka, M. M., Novotny, P. J., Sloan, J. A., Kolars, J. C., Habermann, T. M., & Shanafelt, T. D. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.296.9.1071 · Cited by 1,454
Medical error: the second victim
Wu, A. W. (2000) · Western Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1136/ewjm.172.6.358 · Cited by 477
Self-citationTo tell the truth: Ethical and practical issues in disclosing medical mistakes to patients
Wu, A. W., Cavanaugh, T. A., McPhee, S. J., Lo, B., & Micco, G. P. (1997) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.07163.x · Cited by 383
Self-citationBurlison, J. D., Scott, S. D., Browne, E. K., Thompson, S. G., & Hoffman, J. M. (2017) · Journal of Patient Safety · doi:10.1097/pts.0000000000000129 · Cited by 288
Beyond “see one, do one, teach one”: toward a different training paradigm
Rodriguez-Paz, J. M., Kennedy, M., Salas, E., Wu, A. W., Sexton, J. B., Hunt, E. A., & Pronovost, P. J. (2009) · Postgraduate Medical Journal · doi:10.1136/qshc.2007.023903 · Cited by 280
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, A. W.
- Venue
- Quality and Safety in Health Care
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2003-06-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- >3
- Pages
- 221-226
- ISSN
- 1475-3898 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-3901
- OpenAlex
- W2157283475
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do house officers learn from their mistakes? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/qhc.12.3.221
- The paper
- Wu, A. W. (2003). Do house officers learn from their mistakes? Quality and Safety in Health Care. https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.12.3.221
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.