The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analysis of clinical incidents: a window on the system not a search for root causes
Open accessAbstract
Incident reporting lies at the heart of many initiatives to improve patient safety. The UK National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA)1 has recently launched a national reporting and learning system following substantial piloting and testing across the National Health Service (NHS). In the USA the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) made incident reporting the centrepiece of its first patient safety funding programme, investing $25 million in the first year into research in incident reporting systems.2 The Australian incident monitoring system has amassed a massive database of reports over 15 years.3 New risk management and patient safety programmes-whether local or national-rely on incident reporting to provide data on the nature of safety problems and to provide indications of the causes of those problems and the likely solutions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The problem with root cause analysis
Peerally, M. F., Carr, S., Waring, J., & Dixon-Woods, M. (2017) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005511 · Cited by 398
Incident Reporting and Patient Safety
Vincent, C. (2007) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39071.441609.80 · Cited by 161
Self-citationErnesäter, A., Engström, M., Holmström, I., & Winblad, U. (2010) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1258/jtt.2009.090813 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Vincent, C. A.
- Venue
- Quality and Safety in Health Care
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2004-08-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 242-243
- ISSN
- 1475-3898 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-3901
- OpenAlex
- W2169933178
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of clinical incidents: a window on the system not a search for root causes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/qhc.13.4.242
- The paper
- Vincent, C. A. (2004). Analysis of clinical incidents: a window on the system not a search for root causes. Quality and Safety in Health Care. https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.13.4.242
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.