The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reducing bruising after venepuncture
Open accessAbstract
Bruising after venepuncture is undesirable. To verify an apparent increase in bruising after introducing a new venepuncture system in a small district general hospital and to improve the venepuncture service two prospective audits of the incidence and severity of bruising after venepuncture were performed in two groups of 100 consecutive inpatients undergoing venepuncture by phlebotomists. In the first audit bruising was detected in 45 patients, of whom 34(76%) had bruises > 100 mm2 in area. After modification of the technique, whereby the phlebotomists ensured that haemostasis had been attained before leaving the patient, bruising was significantly reduced, occurring in 25 patients only 9 of whom (36%) had bruises > 100mm2 in area (both p < 0.01) in the second audit. Monitoring of standards and simple modification of technique resulted in significant reduction in incidence and severity of bruising, improving the quality of the venepuncture service.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Also, it has been demonstrated that a failure to apply pressure until the bleeding has stopped may increase the incidence and severity of bruising [100].”
From Joint EFLM-COLABIOCLI Recommendation for venous blood sampling (2018) · cites this paper as [100]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Blood cholesterol concentration: fingerstick plasma vs venous serum sampling
Greenland, P., Bowley, N., Meiklejohn, B., et al. (1990) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1093/clinchem/36.4.628 · Cited by 41
Contamination of blood cultures during venepuncture: fact or myth?
Shahar, E., Wohl-Gottesman, B.-S., & Shenkman, L. (1990) · Postgraduate Medical Journal · doi:10.1136/pgmj.66.782.1053 · Cited by 41
Venepuncture for calcium assays: should we still avoid the tourniquet?
McMullan, A. D., Burns, J. E., & Paterson, C. R. (1990) · Postgraduate Medical Journal · doi:10.1136/pgmj.66.777.547 · Cited by 19
Leppänen, E. (1988) · European Journal Of Haematology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0609.1988.tb00225.x · Cited by 13
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Royal College of Pathologists. Phlebotomists. Bulletin of the Royal College of Pathologists 1989;66:9-11.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Joint EFLM-COLABIOCLI Recommendation for venous blood sampling
Simundic, A.-M., Bölenius, K., Cadamuro, J., Church, S., Cornes, M. P., van Dongen-Lases, E. C., Eker, P., Erdeljanovic, T., Grankvist, K., Guimaraes, J. T., et al. (2018) · Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) · doi:10.1515/cclm-2018-0602 · Cited by 240
Metadata
- Authors
- Godwin, P. G., Cuthbert, A. C., & Choyce, A.
- Affiliations
- Airedale General Hospital (GB)
- Venue
- Quality in Health Care
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1992-12
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 245-246
- ISSN
- 1475-3898 (ISSN-L)
- 0963-8172
- 1475-3901
- PMC
- PMC1055034
- OpenAlex
- W1963644587
- Semantic Scholar
- 3a10cda3c73e7ece92945fc90e1392ef466f5645
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMJ Quality & Safety (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Medical Laboratory Technology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
- Keywords
- bruising, venipuncture, phlebotomy, hemostasis, quality improvement, hospitalized patients
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Blood Specimen Collection, Bloodletting, Data Collection, England, Female, Humans, Male, Medical Audit, Middle Aged, Pathology Department, Hospital, State Medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
